首页> 外文OA文献 >The blended approach to real estate allocations: performance implications of combining an exposure to German Spezialfonds with Global Listed Real Estate Securities
【2h】

The blended approach to real estate allocations: performance implications of combining an exposure to German Spezialfonds with Global Listed Real Estate Securities

机译:房地产分配的混合方法:将德国Spezialfonds的风险敞口与全球上市的房地产证券相结合对绩效的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper seeks to increase the understanding of the performance implications for investors who choose to combine an unlisted real estate portfolio (in this case German Spezialfonds) with a (global) listed real estate element. We call this a “blended” approach to real estate allocations. For the avoidance of doubt, in this paper we are dealing purely with real estate equity (listed and unlisted) allocations, and do not incorporate real estate debt (listed or unlisted) or direct property into the process. ududA previous paper (Moss and Farrelly 2014) showed the benefits of the blended approach as it applied to UK Defined Contribution Pension Schemes. The catalyst for this paper has been the recent attention focused on German pension fund allocations, which have a relatively low (real estate) equity content, and a high bond content. We have used the MSCI Spezialfonds Index as a proxy for domestic German institutional real estate allocations, and the EPRA Global Developed Index as a proxy for a global listed real estate allocation. We also examine whether a rules based trading strategy, in this case Trend Following, can improve the risk adjusted returns above those of a simple buy and hold strategy for our sample period 2004-2015.ududOur findings are that by blending a 30% global listed portfolio with a 70% allocation (as opposed to a typical 100% weighting) to Spezialfonds, the real estate allocation returns increase from 2.88% p.a. to 5.42% pa. Volatility increases, but only to 6.53%., but there is a noticeable impact on maximum drawdown which increases to 19.4%. By using a Trend Following strategy raw returns are improved from 2.88% to 6.94% p.a. , The Sharpe Ratio increases from 1.05 to 1.49 and the Maximum Drawdown ratio is now only 1.83% compared to 19.4% using a buy and hold strategy . Finally, adding this (9%) real estate allocation to a mixed asset portfolio allocation typical for German pension funds there is an improvement in both the raw return (from 7.66% to 8.28%) and the Sharpe Ratio (from 0.91 to 0.98).
机译:本文旨在为选择将未上市的房地产投资组合(本例中为德国Spezialfonds)与(全球)上市的房地产要素结合起来的投资者提供对绩效影响的理解。我们称其为房地产分配的“混合”方法。为避免疑问,在本文中,我们仅处理房地产权益(上市和非上市)分配,并且不将房地产债务(上市或非上市)或直接财产纳入该过程。 ud ud先前的论文(Moss和Farrelly 2014)展示了混合方法在应用于英国固定缴费养老金计划中的好处。这篇文章的催化剂是最近的注意力集中在德国养老基金的分配上,德国养老基金的分配(房地产)权益含量相对较低,而债券含量较高。我们使用MSCI Spezialfonds指数作为德国国内机构房地产分配的代理,而使用EPRA全球发展指数作为全球上市房地产分配的代理。我们还研究了基于规则的交易策略(在本例中为“趋势追踪”)是否可以将风险调整后的收益提高到我们在2004-2015年样本期间采用的简单购买和持有策略的收益。 ud ud我们的发现是将30对Spezialfonds分配了70%(相对于典型的100%权重)的全球上市投资组合的百分比,房地产分配收益从每年2.88%增长至5.42%pa。波动性增加,但仅增加至6.53%。但是,对最大跌幅的影响显着,增加至19.4%。通过采用趋势跟踪策略,年原始回报率从2.88%提高到6.94%。 ,夏普比率从1.05增加到1.49,最大跌落比率现在只有1.83%,而采用买入并持有策略的19.4%。最后,将这种(9%)房地产分配添加到德国养老基金典型的混合资产投资组合分配中,原始收益(从7.66%到8.28%)和夏普比率(从0.91到0.98)都有所提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号