首页> 外文OA文献 >Did Weber have an adequate theory of nationalism? How did his theoretical understanding of nationalism relate to his own passionate German nationalism?
【2h】

Did Weber have an adequate theory of nationalism? How did his theoretical understanding of nationalism relate to his own passionate German nationalism?

机译:韦伯是否有足够的民族主义理论?他对民族主义的理论理解如何与自己热情的德国民族主义联系起来?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A conceptual strategy is proposed in order to link Max Weber’s theory and politics of nationalism. The argument is oriented to rescue the coherence between the scarce theoretical work published by Weber on nation and nationalism, with the prolific role he had as intellectual and militant of German nationalism before and after the First World War. Broadly, nation constitutes itself as a sociological phenomenon in the realm of values, and its effectiveness depends on the nationalist action toward the consolidation and mobilization of the group solidarity through prestige and power. Consequently, a distinction is introduced between “nation in itself”, as an spontaneous process of inter-subjective differentiation of the group –regardless of any objective or racial argument according to Weber’s theory– and “nation for itself”, as the collective action of consolidation of its identity in terms of internal homogeneity and external differentiation (opposition to other nations), through the role of intellectuals in the diffusion of the prestige of the group, and the vocation for political power (state) –where the arguments of Weber nationalism dwell–. Finally, key subjects of Weber’s sociology, as the ethics of political action, the legitimacy of state domination, and social modernization, are reinterpreted in an instrumental sense, as means for the ends of his practical nationalism.Keywords: Max Weber - nation - nationalism - collective action - state - sociological theory
机译:为了将马克斯·韦伯的理论与民族主义政治联系起来,提出了一种概念上的策略。该论点旨在挽救韦伯发表的关于民族与民族主义的稀缺理论著作之间的连贯性,以及他在第一次世界大战前后作为德国民族主义的知识分子和激进分子所发挥的丰富作用。从广义上讲,民族在价值领域构成了自己的社会学现象,其有效性取决于民族主义为通过声望和权力巩固和动员群体团结而采取的行动。因此,区分“民族本身”是作为群体的主体间主观自发分化的自发过程,无论是根据韦伯理论的任何客观或种族论点,还是“民族本身”都是作为群体的集体行动。通过知识分子在团体声望的传播和对政治权力(国家)的追求中的作用,在内部同质性和外部差异(反对其他国家)方面巩固其身份住-。最后,韦伯社会学的关键主题,如政治行动伦理,国家统治的合法性和社会现代化,都从一种工具的意义上进行了重新解释,以此作为其实践民族主义的终结手段。 -集体行动-状态-社会学理论

著录项

  • 作者

    Fleet Nicolas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 spa
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号