Assessing diversity is among the major tasks in ecology and conservation science. In ecological and conservation studies, epiphytic cryptogams are usually sampled up to accessible heights in forests. Thus, their diversity, especially of canopy specialists, likely is underestimated. If the proportion of those species differs among forest types, plot-based diversity assessments are biased and may result in misleading conservation recommendations. We sampled bryophytes and lichens in 30 forest plots of 20 m x 20 m in three German regions, considering all substrates, and including epiphytic litter fall. First, the sampling of epiphytic species was restricted to the lower 2 m of trees and shrubs. Then, on one representative tree per plot, we additionally recorded epiphytic species in the crown, using tree climbing techniques. Per tree, on average 54% of lichen and 20% of bryophyte species were overlooked if the crown was not been included. After sampling all substrates per plot, including the bark of all shrubs and trees, still 38% of the lichen and 4% of the bryophyte species were overlooked if the tree crown of the sampled tree was not included. The number of overlooked lichen species varied strongly among regions. Furthermore, the number of overlooked bryophyte and lichen species per plot was higher in European beech than in coniferous stands and increased with increasing diameter at breast height of the sampled tree. Thus, our results indicate a bias of comparative studies which might have led to misleading conservation recommendations of plot-based diversity assessments.
展开▼
机译:评估多样性是生态学和保护科学的主要任务之一。在生态和保护研究中,附生隐孢子虫通常被采样到森林中可触及的高度。因此,它们的多样性,尤其是林冠专家的多样性,可能被低估了。如果不同森林类型中这些物种的比例不同,则基于样地的多样性评估将有偏差,并可能导致误导性的保护建议。考虑到所有基质,包括附生的凋落物,我们在德国的三个地区的30 m 20 m x 20 m的森林样地中对苔藓植物和地衣进行了采样。首先,附生物种的采样仅限于树木和灌木的下部2 m。然后,在每个样地的一棵代表性树上,我们还使用爬树技术在树冠上记录了附生物种。如果不包括树冠,平均每棵树会忽略54%的地衣和20%的苔藓植物。在每个样地对所有底物进行采样后,包括所有灌木和树木的树皮,如果不包括采样树的树冠,则仍会忽略38%的地衣和4%的苔藓植物物种。在各个地区之间,被忽视的地衣物种的数量差异很大。此外,欧洲山毛榉中每块地被忽略的苔藓植物和地衣种类的数量高于针叶林,并且随着取样树胸高处直径的增加而增加。因此,我们的结果表明比较研究存在偏见,可能导致对基于样地的多样性评估的保护建议产生误导。
展开▼