首页> 外文OA文献 >Lift-off performance in flexure pivot pad and hybrid bearings
【2h】

Lift-off performance in flexure pivot pad and hybrid bearings

机译:挠性枢轴瓦和混合轴承的起升性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Three flexure pivot pad bearings (FPBs) with different preloads are evaluated foruse in high performance applications by comparing them to a hybrid hydrostatic bearing(HHB). One application of these bearings is in turbopumps for liquid rocket engines.To evaluate bearing performance, the lift-off speed of the shaft from the bearing surfaceis experimentally determined. Experimental data of lift-off are collected using a circuitrunning through the shaft and the designed bearing. Other methods for measuring liftoffspeeds were attempted but did not yield consistent results. Water is used as alubricant to simulate a low viscosity medium.In comparison to load-capacity-based predictions for FPBs, the experimentalresults showed lower lift-off speeds, higher load capacities, higher eccentricity ratios,and lower attitude angles. The bearings? predicted load capacity determined lift-offspeed predictions, but the experimental results show no clear trend relating lift-off speedto load capacity. This was for a range of running speeds, with the design speed definedas the final speed in a particular test case.At 0.689 bar supply pressure and for a design speed of 3000 rpm, the HHBshowed greater load capacities and lower eccentricities than the FPBs, but the FPBs hadlower lift-off speeds and attitude angles. In fact, the FPBs in the load-between-padorientation outperformed the HHB in the load-on-pocket orientation with lower lift-offspeeds for the shaft weight-only case. An increased supply pressure lowered the lift-offspeeds in the HHB tests. If the load in the bearing application remains relatively small, aFPB could be substituted for an HHB.
机译:通过将它们与混合静压轴承(HHB)进行比较,评估了三种具有不同预紧力的挠性枢轴瓦轴承(FPB),以用于高性能应用。这些轴承的一种应用是在液体火箭发动机的涡轮泵中。为了评估轴承性能,通过实验确定了轴从轴承表面的提起速度。使用贯穿轴和设计轴承的电路收集剥离的实验数据。尝试了其他测量升空速度的方法,但未获得一致的结果。与基于FPB的基于负载能力的预测相比,水被用作模拟低粘度介质的润滑剂。实验结果表明,较低的提起速度,较高的负载能力,较高的偏心率和较低的姿态角。轴承?预测的载荷能力决定了升空速度的预测,但是实验结果表明,没有明显的趋势将升空速度与载荷能力相关联。这是针对一定范围的运行速度,将设计速度定义为特定测试案例中的最终速度。在0.689 bar的供气压力和3000 rpm的设计速度下,HHB的负载能力和偏心率均比FPB大。 FPB的起飞速度和姿态角较低。实际上,在仅承受轴重的情况下,在横向载荷作用下的FPB在口袋载荷作用下的表现优于HHB,而提升速度更低。供气压力的增加降低了HHB测试中的起升速度。如果轴承应用中的负载仍然较小,则可以用FPB代替HHB。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mertz David Hunter;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号