Modularity is a widespread property in biological systems. It implies that interactions occur mainly within groups of system elements. A modular arrangement facilitates adjustment of one module without perturbing the rest of the system. Therefore, modularity of developmental mechanisms is a major factor for evolvability, the potential to produce beneficial variation from random genetic change. Understanding how modularity evolves in gene regulatory networks, that create the distinct gene activity patterns that characterize different parts of an organism, is key to developmental and evolutionary biology. One hypothesis for the evolution of modules suggests that interactions between some sets of genes become maladaptive when selection favours additional gene activity patterns. The removal of such interactions by selection would result in the formation of modules. A second hypothesis suggests that modularity evolves in response to sparseness, the scarcity of interactions within a system. Here I simulate the evolution of gene regulatory networks and analyse diverse experimentally sustained networks to study the relationship between sparseness and modularity. My results suggest that sparseness alone is neither sufficient nor necessary to explain modularity in gene regulatory networks. However, sparseness amplifies the effects of forms of selection that, like selection for additional gene activity patterns, already produce an increase in modularity. That evolution of new gene activity patterns is frequent across evolution also supports that it is a major factor in the evolution of modularity. That sparseness is widespread across gene regulatory networks indicates that it may have facilitated the evolution of modules in a wide variety of cases.
展开▼
机译:模块化是生物系统中的广泛性质。它意味着互动主要发生在系统元素组中。模块化布置有助于调整一个模块,而不会扰乱其余系统。因此,发育机制的模块性是进化的主要因素,可能产生与随机遗传变化有益变化的可能性。了解模块化在基因调节网络中的发展,它创造了表征不同部位的不同基因活性模式,是发育和进化生物学的关键。 One hypothesis for the evolution of modules suggests that interactions between some sets of genes become maladaptive when selection favours additional gene activity patterns.通过选择去除这种相互作用将导致模块的形成。第二个假设表明,模块化响应于稀疏性而发展,系统内的相互作用的稀缺性。在这里,我模拟了基因监管网络的演变,并分析了不同的实验持续网络,以研究稀疏性和模块化之间的关系。我的结果表明,单独的稀疏性既不是在基因监管网络中解释模块化也不是必要的。然而,稀疏性放大了选择形式的效果,即对额外基因活性模式的选择,已经产生了模块化的增加。新基因活性模式的演变频繁跨越进化也频繁地支持模块化的演变是一个主要因素。稀疏性跨越基因监管网络普遍认为它可能已经促进了各种情况下模块的演变。
展开▼