首页> 外文OA文献 >The Efficacy of Infliximab Monotherapy versus Infliximab-Azathioprine Sequential Treatment in Crohn’s Disease: Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center in China
【2h】

The Efficacy of Infliximab Monotherapy versus Infliximab-Azathioprine Sequential Treatment in Crohn’s Disease: Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center in China

机译:英夫利昔单抗单疗法对克罗恩疾病中英夫利昔单抗的疗效:中国高等医疗中心的经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) monotherapy versus infliximab-azathioprine sequential treatment in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. Methods. Patients newly diagnosed with CD using IFX as induction therapy were enrolled. After 6 times of IFX infusions, they were divided into IFX monotherapy group and IFX-AZA sequential therapy group. Clinical remission rates were assessed at weeks 57, 84, 111, and 138 while endoscopic remission rates were assessed at weeks 84 and 138 to evaluate the efficacy of these two groups. Results. A total of seventy-nine patients had accomplished 138-week follow-up. At weeks 84 and 138, the deep remission rate (18/22 and 17/22) of IFX monotherapy group was significantly higher compared to IFX-AZA sequential therapy group (26/57 and 21/57) (P=0.004 and 0.001, resp.). Similar findings were found in complete endoscopic remission rate. The clinical remission rates of IFX monotherapy group were similar to that of IFX-AZA sequential therapy group (P>0.05). At weeks 84 and 138, the endoscopic remission rate and the endoscopic improvement rate between these two groups displayed no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusion. IFX monotherapy provides higher deep remission rate compared with IFX-AZA sequential therapy in two-year maintenance therapy. For patients who could not receive prolonged IFX therapy, IFX-AZA sequential therapy is acceptable, though long-term efficacy remains to be seen.
机译:客观的。为了评估英夫利昔单抗(IFX)单疗法对克罗恩病(CD)患者的嗜肝单疗法的疗效。方法。注册了使用IFX作为感应疗法进行新诊断患有CD的患者。 IFX输注6次后,它们分为IFX单疗法组和IFX-AZA序贯治疗组。在数周57,84,111和138周内评估临床缓解率,而在数周84和138时评估内镜缓解率,以评估这两组的功效。结果。共有七十九个患者完成了138周的随访。在周期84和138周,与IFX-AZA顺序治疗组(26/57和21/57)相比,IFX单疗法组的深度缓解率(18/22和17/22)显着高于(P = 0.004和0.001, resp。)。在完全内窥镜缓解率中发现了类似的发现。 IFX单疗法组的临床缓解率类似于IFX-AZA顺序治疗组(P> 0.05)。在第84和138周,内镜下缓解率和这两组之间的内窥镜提高率无显着差异(P> 0.05)。结论。与两年的维护治疗中的IFX-AZA连续治疗相比,IFX单疗法提供更高的深度缓解率。对于无法延长IFX治疗的患者,IFX-AZA连续治疗是可以接受的,但仍有待观察的长期疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号