首页> 外文OA文献 >Pathways to antibiotics in Bangladesh: A qualitative study investigating how and when households access medicine including antibiotics for humans or animals when they are ill
【2h】

Pathways to antibiotics in Bangladesh: A qualitative study investigating how and when households access medicine including antibiotics for humans or animals when they are ill

机译:孟加拉国抗生素的途径:调查如何以及当家庭接入药物的定性研究,包括人类或动物的抗生素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundTo understand how to reduce antibiotic use, greater knowledge is needed about the complexities of access in countries with loose regulation or enforcement. This study aimed to explore how households in Bangladesh were accessing antimicrobials for themselves and their domestic animals.MethodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 48 households in one urban and one rural area. Households were purposively sampled from two lower income strata, prioritising those with under 5-year olds, older adults, household animals and minority groups. Households where someone was currently ill with a suspected infection (13 households) were invited for a follow-up interview. Framework analysis was used to explore access to healthcare and medicines.FindingsPeople accessed medicines for themselves through five pathways: drugs shops, private clinics, government/charitable hospitals, community/family planning clinics, and specialised/private hospitals. Drug shops provided direct access to medicines for common, less serious and acute illnesses. For persistent or serious illnesses, the healthcare pathway may include contacts with several of these settings, but often relied on medicines provided by drug shops. In the 13 households with an unwell family member, most received at least one course of antibiotics for this illness. Multiple and incomplete dosing were common even when prescribed by a qualified doctor. Antibiotics were identified by their high cost compared to other medicines. Cost was a reported barrier to purchasing full courses of antibiotics. Few households in the urban area kept household animals. In this rural area, government animal health workers provided most care for large household animals (cows), but drug shops were also important.ConclusionsIn Bangladesh, unregulated drug shops provide an essential route to medicines including those prescribed in the formal sector. Wherever licensed suppliers are scarce and expensive, regulations which prohibit this supply risk removing access entirely for many people.
机译:背景技术如何降低抗生素使用,需要更大的知识对具有宽松监管或执法的国家的访问复杂性。本研究旨在探讨孟加拉国的家庭如何为自己和国内动物提供抗菌药物。在一个城市和一个农村地区的48户家庭进行了一定的户。家庭从两个低收入地层自动取样,优先考虑5岁,老年人,家庭动物和少数群体。有人目前患有疑似感染(13个家庭)的家庭被邀请进行后续采访。框架分析被用来探索医疗保健和药物的访问.FindingsPeople通过五种途径获得药物:药品店,私人诊所,政府/慈善医院,社区/计划生育诊所和专业/私立医院。药店提供直接进入常见,不那么严重和急性疾病的药物。对于持续或严重的疾病,医疗保健途径可以包括与几种环境中的联系人,但通常依赖于药品店提供的药物。在13个户外家庭成员的家庭中,最多收到了这项疾病的至少一种抗生素课程。即使由合格的医生开门,多种和不完全的给药也很常见。与其他药物相比,通过其高成本确定抗生素。成本是购买全疗法的抗生素课程的障碍。很少有城市的家庭保存家庭动物。在这个农村地区,政府动物卫生工作者为大型家庭动物提供了大多数护理,但药店也很重要.Clackusionsin孟加拉国,不受管制的药店提供给包括正规部门规定的药品的基本路线。无论何处许可的供应商都稀缺和昂贵,条例禁止此供应风险完全用于许多人的访问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号