首页> 外文OA文献 >Role of the judge in defending tobacco control measures in Colombia: total ban on advertising, promotion and sponsorship of tobacco products case
【2h】

Role of the judge in defending tobacco control measures in Colombia: total ban on advertising, promotion and sponsorship of tobacco products case

机译:法官在哥伦比亚捍卫烟草控制措施方面的作用:烟草制品案件的广告,促进和赞助总禁令

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and challenges to implementationTotal ban of all forms of advertising, promotion and sponsorship of tobacco products is considered one of the most cost effective measures for tobacco control in the world. Colombia incorporated this measure through articles 14 to 17 of Law 1335 -2009, which entered into force on July 21, 2011. These articles were sued for limiting the right to freedom of enterprise and commercial discourse of tobacco companies.Intervention or responseCorpus iuris international for the control of tobacco (FCTC and guidelines), requires all efforts for effective compliance, for this, is necessary to carry out the exercise of harmonisation of domestic legal system with obligations derived from international treaties. At this point, it is vital to point out that compliance with rules adopted by the country, based on international treaties, must be given in good faith , understanding that the ultimate goal is the real guarantee of the pledged commitments of all State agencies. In this case judicial power confirm the constitutionality of the measures related with total ban.Results and lessons learntColombian jurisprudence has shown that Article 16 of that rule, referring to the prohibition of "any form of promotion of tobacco products and their derivatives"; constitutes a broad clause that must be interpreted in accordance with the international instruments subscribed by the country and which include the contents of articles 1 and 13 of FCTC, as well as its implementation guidelines.Conclusions and key recommendationsColombia, has established a total ban on all forms of advertising, promotion and sponsorship of tobacco, as a result of the harmonization process between internal rules, mainly related to measures to protect the right to health of the population. In view of the adverse consequences of tobacco consumption and exposure to tobacco smoke and the international obligations set out in the first legally binding public health treaty within the United Nations System: WHO´s FCTC.
机译:背景和挑战禁止各种形式的广告,促销和赞助的烟草产品被认为是世界上最具成本效益的烟草控制措施之一。哥伦比亚通过第1335 -2009条的第14至17条纳入了这一措施,该措施于2011年7月21日生效。这些物品被起诉限制烟草公司的企业和商业话语的权利。ITURIS国际因素对烟草(FCTC和指南)的控制需要所有有效遵守的努力,这是必须在国际条约的义务中执行国内法律制度的统一。在这一点上,必须诚信地履行基于国际条约,遵守国家通过的规则,了解最终目标是所有国家机构对承诺承诺的真正保证。在这种情况下,司法权证实了与总禁令有关的措施的合宪性。结果和课程学习士组织判例表明,该规则第16条提到禁止“任何形式的烟草产品和衍生物促进衍生物”;构成必须按照该国认购的国际文书进行解释的宽大条款,其中包括FCTC第1和第13条的内容,以及其执行指南。结论和关键建议校准,已经建立了全部禁令由于内部规则之间的协调过程,主要是与保护人口健康权的措施的统一过程,烟草的广告,促销和赞助的形式。鉴于烟草消费和暴露于烟草烟雾的不良后果以及联合国系统内第一个法律约束力的公共卫生条约中所载的国际义务:谁是谁的FCTC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号