首页> 外文OA文献 >Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: Health-Economic Evaluation From the Societal and Public Health Care Perspective Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial
【2h】

Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: Health-Economic Evaluation From the Societal and Public Health Care Perspective Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:引导基于互联网的认知行为治疗:来自随机对照试验的社会和公共卫生视角的健康经济评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe evidence base for internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (iCBT-I) is firm; however, little is known about iCBT-I’s health-economic effects. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost–utility of iCBT-I in reducing insomnia among schoolteachers. MethodsSchoolteachers (N=128) with clinically significant insomnia symptoms and work-related rumination were randomized to guided iCBT-I or a wait list control group, both with unrestricted access to treatment as usual. Health care use, patient and family expenditures, and productivity losses were self-assessed and used for costing from a societal and a public health care perspective. Costs were related to symptom-free status (score <8 on the insomnia severity index) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Sampling error was handled using nonparametric bootstrapping. ResultsStatistically significant differences favoring the intervention group were found for both health outcomes (symptom-free status yes or no: β=.30; 95% CI 0.16-0.43; QALYs: β=.019, 95% CI 0.01-0.03). From a societal perspective, iCBT-I had a 94% probability of dominating the wait list control for both health outcomes. From a public health care perspective, iCBT-I was more effective but also more expensive than the wait list control, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €650 per symptom-free individual. In terms of QALYs, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €11,285. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per QALY gained, the intervention’s probability of being cost-effective was 89%. ConclusionsOur trial indicates that iCBT could be considered as a good value-for-money intervention for insomnia. Trial RegistrationGerman Clinical Trial Registry: DRKS00004700; https://tinyurl.com/2nnk57jm International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1186/1745-6215-14-169
机译:对于失眠的基于互联网的认知行为疗法背景:证据基础(ICBT-I)是坚定的;然而,鲜为人知的是,ICBT,我的健康和经济的影响。 ObjectiveThis研究旨在减少教师之间失眠评估ICBT-I的成本效益和成本效用。 MethodsSchoolteachers(N = 128)具有临床显著失眠症状和工作相关的反刍被随机分配到引导ICBT-I或等待列表对照组,既不受限制地访问处理照常进行。保健使用,病人和家属的开支和生产力损失是自我评估和用于从社会和公共保健角度来看成本。费用相关的症状无状态(对失眠严重程度指数评分<8)和质量调整生命年上涨(的QALY)。抽样误差的非参数引导处理。有利于干预组ResultsStatistically显著差异,找到了对健康结局(症状无状态yes或no:β= 0.30; 95%CI 0.16-0.43;质量调整生命年:β= 0.019,95%CI 0.01-0.03)。从社会的角度来看,ICBT,我不得不为主导既健康结果的等待列表控制的94%的概率。从公共卫生保健角度来看,ICBT,我是比较有效的,但也比等待列表控制更加昂贵,导致每个无症状个体€650的增量成本效益比。在的QALY而言,增量成本 - 效果比为€11285。在€20,000 QALY获得了愿意到支付门槛,被成本效益的干预的概率为89%。 ConclusionsOur试验表明,ICBT可以被认为是一个很好的价值换取货币的干预失眠。试用RegistrationGerman临床试验注册地:DRKS00004700; https://tinyurl.com/2nnk57jm国际注册报告标识符(IRRID)RR2-10.1186 / 1745-6215-14-169

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号