The characteristic colors of the different classes of algae and the striking changes in color of individuals (especially among the Cyanophyceae) have compelled the attention of botanists for many years. Engelmann (1883) observed the rate of assimilation of a number of kinds of algae in the different parts of the spectrum. He concluded that they assimilated fastest in light of a color complementary to their own, and suggested that this effect controlled their distribution in nature. Gaidukov (1902) cultivated Cyanophyceae in light from different parts of the spectrum and found that they assumed a color complementary to that of the incident light. This phenomenon he called "complementary chromatic adaptation." However, Oltmanns (1893) grew marine algae in light of different colors and light of different intensities and concluded that the differences in color of the algae depended principally on differences in intensity. A third proposal was made by Schindler (1913) on the basis of experiments on the cultivation of Oscillatoriaceae. He decided that the color of the algae depended primarily on the supply of essential food materials, especially nitrogen compounds, and that the intensity of light influenced only the rate of color change by influencing the rate of the organisms' growth and hence of exhaustion of the medium. A large amount of work has appeared supporting each of the three doctrines. The best discussions of the literature are to be found in Schindler (1913) and Harder (1923). ududMuch of the work done hitherto has been accomplished under unfavorable circumstances. The organisms used have grown slowly or not at all or have died during the experiments (Harder 1922). The color changes have often been slight or have affected only some of the individuals studied (Gaidukov 1902). The experimenters have usually been satisfied to work at low light intensities or in the varying and interrupted light of day (v. Richter 1912, Boresch 1921, Harder 1923). The experiments of which a preliminary report is given below were conducted in the course of developing a standard technique of cultivation which would produce uniform material for work on the photosynthesis of a blue-green alga. The organism used develops vigorously and uniformly under the conditions devised, but if the illumination is varied in the ways described, it exhibits striking color changes. In my opinion the relation of the color changes to changes in the illumination is so clear that the conflicting theories of the past may be judged in its light.
展开▼
机译:多年以来,不同种类藻类的特征颜色以及个体(尤其是蓝藻科植物)的颜色发生了惊人的变化,已引起植物学家的关注。 Engelmann(1883)观察了光谱不同部分中多种藻类的同化率。他的结论是,根据与它们自身互补的颜色,它们吸收最快,并建议这种效果控制着它们在自然界中的分布。盖杜科夫(Gaidukov,1902年)在光谱不同部分的光下培育蓝藻科,发现它们假定的颜色与入射光互补。他称这种现象为“互补色适应”。然而,Oltmanns(1893)根据不同的颜色和不同的强度来生长海藻,并得出结论,藻类的颜色差异主要取决于强度的差异。辛德勒(1913)在种植颤藻科的实验基础上提出了第三条建议。他认为藻类的颜色主要取决于必需食物的供应,尤其是氮化合物,并且光的强度仅通过影响生物的生长速度并因此耗尽其消耗来影响颜色变化的速度。介质。已经出现了大量的工作来支持这三种学说。文献中最好的讨论见辛德勒(1913)和哈德(1923)。 ud ud迄今为止所做的许多工作都是在不利的情况下完成的。实验中使用的生物生长缓慢或根本没有生长,或者已经死亡(Harder 1922)。颜色变化通常很小,或仅影响某些研究的个体(Gaidukov 1902)。通常,对实验人员感到满意的是,它们可以在低光强度下或在日间变化和间断的光线下工作(v。Richter 1912,Boresch 1921,Harder 1923)。在开发标准栽培技术的过程中进行了以下初步试验的实验,该标准栽培技术将产生用于蓝绿藻光合作用的均匀物质。在设定的条件下,所使用的生物体会旺盛且均匀地发育,但是如果以所述方式改变光照,则其将呈现出惊人的颜色变化。在我看来,颜色变化与照明变化之间的关系非常清楚,以至于可以根据其光辉来判断过去相互矛盾的理论。
展开▼