首页> 外文OA文献 >Social justice in consumer protection: the Indonesian framework = (Keadilan sosial dalam perlindungan pengguna: rangka kerja Indonesia)
【2h】

Social justice in consumer protection: the Indonesian framework = (Keadilan sosial dalam perlindungan pengguna: rangka kerja Indonesia)

机译:消费者保护中的社会正义:印度尼西亚框架=(用户保护中的社会正义:印度尼西亚框架)

摘要

The legal system of Indonesia is underpinned by the Pancasila, a political philosophy introduced by President Sukarnowhen Indonesia obtained independence from the Dutch in 1945. Its fifth pillar, the ‘Keadilan Sosial bagi Seluruh RakyatIndonesia’ which is literally translated as “social justice for the whole people of Indonesia”, calls for the equitableallocation of resources while protecting the weaker sector of the Indonesian population. Adopting a substantive-proceduraldichotomy approach, this paper examines how this indigenous conception of social justice has shaped and in fluenced consumer protection in Indonesia. It explores specific aspects of social justice in the formulation of consumer rightsand obligations, representation, education and dispute settlement, particularly in the establishment of the NationaludConsumer Protection Agency (NCPA) and the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board (CDSB). As expected, the paper findsudevidence that the Pancasilan notion of social justice advances a liberal consumer protection framework as embodied in Indonesia’s Law on Consumer Protection (LCP), which while balancing substantive rights procedurally tilts the regimein favour of consumers to temper the stronger position of entrepreneurs. It also predictably conudfirms that consistent withsocial justice tenets, consumer protection in Indonesia is pro-consumer and encourages shared responsibility betweenthe government and the private secto
机译:印度尼西亚的法律体系以潘卡西拉为基础,潘卡西拉是Sukarnowhen总统提出的政治哲学,印度尼西亚于1945年脱离荷兰独立。其第五大支柱“ Keadilan Sosial bagi Seluruh RakyatIndonesia”直译为“整个社会的正义”。印度尼西亚人民”,呼吁在保护印度尼西亚人口弱势群体的同时,公平分配资源。本文采用一种实质性的程序二分法,研究了这种社会正义的本土观念如何在印尼塑造并影响了消费者保护。它在制定消费者权利和义务,代表权,教育和争端解决方面,特别是在建立国家 ud消费者保护局(NCPA)和消费者争端解决委员会(CDSB)的过程中,探索了社会正义的具体方面。正如预期的那样,该论文发现证据表明,Pancasilan的社会正义概念促进了印度尼西亚的《消费者保护法》(LCP)所体现的自由的消费者保护框架,该框架在平衡实质性权利的同时从程序上倾斜了有利于消费者的制度,以缓和更强的地位的企业家。它也可以预见地证明,与社会正义原则一致,印度尼西亚的消费者保护是亲消费者的,并鼓励政府与私人部门之间承担共同责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号