首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing Sentinel-1 Surface Water Mapping Algorithms and Radiometric Terrain Correction Processing in Southeast Asia Utilizing Google Earth Engine
【2h】

Comparing Sentinel-1 Surface Water Mapping Algorithms and Radiometric Terrain Correction Processing in Southeast Asia Utilizing Google Earth Engine

机译:利用Google地球发动机比较东南亚的Sentinel-1表面水映射算法和辐射尺寸校正处理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Satellite remote sensing plays an important role in the monitoring of surface water for historical analysis and near real-time applications. Due to its cloud penetrating capability, many studies have focused on providing efficient and high quality methods for surface water mapping using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR). However, few studies have explored the effects of SAR pre-processing steps used and the subsequent results as inputs into surface water mapping algorithms. This study leverages the Google Earth Engine to compare two unsupervised histogram-based thresholding surface water mapping algorithms utilizing two distinct pre-processed Sentinel-1 SAR datasets, specifically one with and one without terrain correction. The resulting surface water maps from the four different collections were validated with user-interpreted samples from high-resolution Planet Scope data. It was found that the overall accuracy from the four collections ranged from 92% to 95% with Cohen’s Kappa coefficients ranging from 0.7999 to 0.8427. The thresholding algorithm that samples a histogram based on water edge information performed best with a maximum accuracy of 95%. While the accuracies varied between methods it was found that there is no statistical significant difference between the errors of the different collections. Furthermore, the surface water maps generated from the terrain corrected data resulted in a intersection over union metrics of 95.8%–96.4%, showing greater spatial agreement, as compared to 92.3%–93.1% intersection over union using the non-terrain corrected data. Overall, it was found that algorithms using terrain correction yield higher overall accuracy and yielded a greater spatial agreement between methods. However, differences between the approaches presented in this paper were not found to be significant suggesting both methods are valid for generating accurate surface water maps. High accuracy surface water maps are critical to disaster planning and response efforts, thus results from this study can help inform SAR data users on the pre-processing steps needed and its effects as inputs on algorithms for surface water mapping applications.
机译:卫星遥感在历史分析和近实时应用的地表水监测中起着重要作用。由于其云穿透能力,许多研究专注于使用合成孔径雷达(SAR)为表面水映射提供高质量和高质量的方法。然而,很少有研究探索了SAR预处理步骤使用的影响以及随后的结果作为进入地表水映射算法的输入。该研究利用Google地球发动机比较了两个无监视的直方图的阈值面积水映射算法,利用两个不同的预处理的哨声-1 SAR数据集,特别是一个没有地形校正。来自四种不同收集的所得表面水图与来自高分辨率行星范围数据的用户解释的样本进行了验证。发现,四个集合的总体精度范围为92%至95%,Cohen的Kappa系数范围为0.7999至0.8427。基于水边信息采样直方图的阈值算法最佳,最大精度为95%。虽然方法之间的准确性变化,但发现不同集合的误差之间没有统计显着差异。此外,地图从地形产生的表面水校正数据导致超过95.8%-96.4%联合度量相交,示出更大的空间协议,如使用非地形校正的数据相比,92.3%-93.1%上相交联合。总的来说,发现使用地形校正的算法产生更高的总体精度,并在方法之间产生了更大的空间协议。然而,本文呈现的方法之间的差异未发现这两种方法对于产生准确的表面水图有效。高精度地表水地图是灾难规划和应对工作的关键,因此,从这项研究结果可以帮助告知SAR数据用户所需要的前处理步骤,其作为算法地表水地图应用的输入效果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号