首页> 外文OA文献 >Is a proton-pump inhibitor necessary after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms? A propensity score analysis
【2h】

Is a proton-pump inhibitor necessary after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms? A propensity score analysis

机译:是一种质子泵抑制剂,在浅表粘膜肿瘤后的浅表性食管肿瘤后必需?倾向分数分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Little is known about the efficacy of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in the management of esophageal ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of PPI in ulcer healing following ESD for superficial esophageal neoplasms, using a propensity score analytic approach. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single referral center. Between April 2005 and August 2015, 199 consecutive patients with superficial esophageal cancer and esophageal dysplasia underwent ESD. For patients with PPI administration, intravenous PPI therapy was commenced immediately after ESD, and oral PPI was administered daily from post-operative day 3, until ulcer healing was identified. We compared the remnant-ulcer rate at 4 weeks after esophageal ESD between the PPI administration and non-PPI groups, using propensity scores and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. Results: After exclusions, a total of 88 patients were analyzed. The remnant-ulcer rate at 4 weeks after ESD was 25.5% (12/47) and 14.6% (6/41) in the PPI administration and non-PPI groups ( p  = 0.21). After adjusting for background factors using IPTW, the risk of a remnant ulcer in the PPI administration group was not decreased significantly compared with that in the non-PPI group [odds ratio (OR) = 2.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73–7.97, p  = 0.15]. Furthermore, PPI therapy did not decrease significantly the remnant-ulcer rate on logistic regression analysis after adjusting for the propensity score (OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 0.69–8.32, p  = 0.15). Conclusion: PPI administration does not promote ulcer healing after ESD for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
机译:背景:关于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗在食管溃疡的治疗中的疗效几乎是众所周知的内镜粘膜抑制剂(ESD)的疗效。因此,本研究的目的是研究PPI在ESD对浅表食管肿瘤后溃疡愈合的功效,使用倾向得分分析方法。方法:该回顾性队列研究在单个推荐中心进行。 2005年4月至2015年8月期间,连续199例患有浅表食管癌和食管发育不良的患者进行了eSD。对于PPI给药患者,在ESD后立即开始静脉注射PPI治疗,并且每天从操作后第3天每天施用口服PPI,直至鉴定溃疡愈合。在PPI给药和非PPI基团之间使用倾向分数和治疗加权(IPTW)方法的反概率,将遗留溃疡与食管ESD后4周进行比较。结果:排除后,共分析了88名患者。 ESD后4周的残留溃疡率为25.5%(12/47)和PPI给药和非PPI基团的14.6%(6/41)(P = 0.21)。在使用IPTW进行背景因子进行调整之后,与非PPI组中PPI施用组中残余溃疡的风险显着降低[差异比(或)= 2.42,95%置信区间(CI):0.73 -7.97,p = 0.15]。此外,在调整倾向评分(或= 2.40,95%CI:0.69-8.32,P = 0.15)后,PPI治疗在逻辑回归分析上没有显着降低了逻辑回归分析的残余溃疡率。结论:PPI施用在ESD浅表浅表食管鳞状细胞癌后不会促进溃疡愈合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号