首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparation and evaluation of the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the medial patellofemoral ligament femoral tunnel: a cadaveric and clinical study
【2h】

Comparation and evaluation of the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the medial patellofemoral ligament femoral tunnel: a cadaveric and clinical study

机译:比较与评价硫磺定位方法的准确性,建立中介髌韧带韧带股骨隧道:一种尸体与临床研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background In anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, malpositioning of the MPFL femoral tunnel is common. A palpable sulcus reportedly exists at the anatomic femoral attachment of the MPFL. The present study aimed to investigate the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the MPFL femoral tunnel. Methods A cadaveric study was first done on 12 knees to evaluate the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the entry points of the MPFL femoral tunnel in comparison with the midpoint and fluoroscopic localization methods. The center of the native MPFL femoral attachment was served as the reference in the cadaveric study. A clinical study was then performed to further evaluate the accuracy of the sulcus localization method in 53 patients (60 knees). Schöttle’s point was served as the reference in the clinical study. Femoral tunnel placement was defined as accurate when it was less than 5 mm from Schöttle’s point. In both the cadaveric and clinical studies, MPFL femoral tunnel placement was assessed on postoperative reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images. In the cadaveric study, the accuracy of different localization methods was compared using analysis of variance. Results In the cadaveric study, the mean distances from the native MPFL attachment to the femoral tunnel entry point were 4.2 ± 1.0 mm (range 2.4–5.6 mm), 4.4 ± 1.4 mm (range 1.8–6.6 mm) and 2.9 ± 0.8 mm (range 1.9–4.4 mm) using the midpoint, fluoroscopic, and sulcus localization methods, respectively; this distance significantly differed between the midpoint and sulcus localization methods, and between the fluoroscopic and sulcus localization methods (p ≤ .05). While there were no significant differences between the midpoint and fluoroscopic localization methods (n.s.). In the clinical study, the mean distance between the femoral tunnel and Schöttle’s point was 3.5 ± 1.5 mm (range 0.4–6.1 mm), with accurate tunnel placement achieved in 49 of 60 cases (82%). Conclusion The sulcus localization method can accurately guide MPFL femoral tunnel placement. This method might be useful for orthopedic surgeons. Level of evidence IV
机译:抽象背景技术在解剖内侧髌韧带(MPFL)重建,malpositioning的MPFL股骨隧道的是常见的。可触摸的沟在MPFL的解剖股骨附着据说存在。本研究旨在探讨沟定位方法建立MPFL股骨隧道的准确性。方法对尸体研究首次对12个膝进行评估沟定位方法的准确度,建立与中点和X射线荧光定位方法相比,MPFL股骨隧道的入口点。本地MPFL股骨附着的中心担任在尸体研究参考。然后进行的临床研究,以进一步评估在53名患者(60个膝)的沟定位方法的准确性。 Schöttle的观点是担任临床研究参考。股骨隧道放置被定义为准确时,它是从Schöttle的角度小于5毫米。在尸体和临床研究两,MPFL股骨隧道放置了评估术后重建的三维计算机断层成像图像。在尸体研究,不同的定位方法的准确性,使用方差分析进行比较。结果在尸体研究,从天然MPFL附件的平均距离到股骨隧道入口点分别为4.2±1.0毫米(范围2.4-5.6毫米),4.4±1.4毫米(范围1.8-6.6毫米)和2.9±0.8毫米(使用中点,荧光范围1.9-4.4毫米),和沟定位方法,分别;这个距离的中点和沟定位方法之间显著不同,和荧光透视和沟定位方法(P≤0.05)之间。虽然有中点和X射线荧光定位方法(N.S.)之间没有显著差异。在临床研究中,股骨隧道和Schöttle的点之间的平均距离为3.5±1.5毫米(范围0.4-6.1毫米),具有精确的隧道放置在60例(82%)49来实现。结论该沟定位方法可以准确地引导MPFL股骨隧道放置。这种方法可能是骨科医生有用。证据IV水平

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号