首页> 外文OA文献 >Rethinking ‘Top‐Down’ and ‘Bottom‐Up’ Roles of Top and Middle Managers in Organizational Change: Implications for Employee Support
【2h】

Rethinking ‘Top‐Down’ and ‘Bottom‐Up’ Roles of Top and Middle Managers in Organizational Change: Implications for Employee Support

机译:在组织变革中重新思考“自上而下”和“自下而上”的角色和中层管理人员的角色:对员工支持的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this study we integrate insights from ‘top-down' and ‘bottom-up' traditions in organizational change research to understand employees' varying dispositions to support change. We distinguish between change initiation and change execution roles and identify four possible role configurations in which top managers (TMs) and middle managers (MMs) can feature in change. We contend that both TMs and MMs can play change initiation and/or change execution roles, TMs and MMs have different strengths and limitations for taking on different change roles, and their relative strengths and limitations are compounded or attenuated based on the specific configuration of change roles. We subsequently hypothesize employee support for change in relation to different TM-MM change role configurations. Our findings show that change initiated by TMs does not engender above-average level of employee support. However, change initiated by MMs engenders above-average level of employee support, and even more so, if TMs handle the change execution.
机译:在这项研究中,我们将来自“自上而下”和“自下而上”传统的见解整合在组织变革研究中,以了解员工不同的性格来支持变革。我们区分更改启动和更改执行角色,并确定最佳管理器(TMS)和中间管理器(MMS)可以在更改中进行四种可能的角色配置。我们争辩说,TMS和MMS都可以播放更改启动和/或更改执行角色,TMS和MMS具有不同的强度和接受不同变化角色的限制,并且它们的相对强度和限制基于变化的特定配置复合或衰减角色。我们随后假设员工支持与不同TM-MM更改角色配置相关的变更。我们的调查结果表明,TMS发起的变化并不能够获得高于平均水平的员工支持。但是,MMS发起的更改参与平均水平的员工支持,甚至更多,如果TMS处理更改执行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号