首页> 外文OA文献 >Reforms: A Quest for Efficiency or an Opportunity for Vested Interests'? A Case Study of Pharmaceutical Policy Reforms in Tanzania.
【2h】

Reforms: A Quest for Efficiency or an Opportunity for Vested Interests'? A Case Study of Pharmaceutical Policy Reforms in Tanzania.

机译:改革:追求效率还是既得利益的机会?坦桑尼亚药品政策改革案例研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Regulation of the pharmaceutical sector is a challenging task for most governments in the developing countries. In Tanzania, this task falls under the Food and Drugs Authority and the Pharmacy Council. In 2010, the Pharmacy Council spearheaded policy reforms in the pharmaceutical sector aimed at taking over the control of the regulation of the business of pharmacy from the Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority. This study provides a critical analysis of these reforms. The study employed a qualitative case-study design. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions and document reviews. Data was analyzed thematically using a policy triangle framework. The analysis was done manually. The reforms adopted an incremental model of public policy-making and the process was characterized by lobbying for political support, negotiations and bargaining between the interest groups. These negotiations were largely centred on vested interests and not on the impact of the reforms on the efficiency of pharmaceutical regulations in the country. Stakeholders from the micro and meso levels were minimally involved in the policy reforms. Recent pharmaceutical regulation reforms in Tanzania were overshadowed by vested interests, displacing a critical analysis of optimal policy options that have the potential to increase efficiency in the regulation of the business of pharmacy. Politics influenced decision-making at different levels of the reform process.
机译:对于发展中国家的大多数政府而言,医药行业的监管是一项艰巨的任务。在坦桑尼亚,这项任务属于食品和药物管理局和药房委员会的管辖。 2010年,药房委员会率先进行了医药行业的政策改革,目的是接管坦桑尼亚食品药品管理局对药房业务的管制。这项研究提供了对这些改革的批判性分析。该研究采用定性的案例研究设计。通过深入的采访,焦点小组讨论和文档审查收集了数据。使用政策三角框架对数据进行了主题分析。分析是手动完成的。改革采取了逐步制定公共政策的模式,其过程的特点是游说各利益集团之间的政治支持,谈判和讨价还价。这些谈判主要集中在既得利益上,而不是在改革对该国药品法规效率的影响上。微观和中观层面的利益相关者很少参与政策改革。既得利益集团掩盖了坦桑尼亚最近的药品监管改革,取代了对有可能提高药品监管效率的最佳政策选择的批判性分析。政治影响了改革过程中不同层次的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号