首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of Classical Operators and Fuzzy Logic Algorithms for Edge Detection of Panels at Exterior Cladding of Buildings
【2h】

Evaluation of Classical Operators and Fuzzy Logic Algorithms for Edge Detection of Panels at Exterior Cladding of Buildings

机译:建筑物外部包层外板边缘检测古典运营商和模糊逻辑算法的评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The automated process of construction defect detection using non-contact methods provides vital information for quality control and updating building information modelling. The external cladding in modular construction should be regularly controlled in terms of the quality of panels and proper installation because its appearance is very important for clients. However, there are limited computational methods for examining the installation issues of external cladding remotely in an automated manner. These issues could be the incorrect sitting of a panel, unequal joints in an elevation, scratches or cracks on the face of a panel or dimensions of different elements of external cladding. This paper aims to present seven algorithms to detect panel edges and statistically compare their performance through application on two scenarios of buildings in construction sites. Two different scenarios are selected, where the building façades are available to the public, and a sample of 100 images is taken using a state-of-the-art 3D camera for edge detection analysis. The experimentation results are validated by using a series of computational error and accuracy analyses and statistical methods including Mean Square Error, Peak Signal to Noise Ratio and Structural Similarity Index. The performance of an image processing algorithm depends on the quality of images and the algorithm utilised. The results show better performance of the fuzzy logic algorithm because it detects clear edges for installed panels. The applications of classical operators including Sobel, Canny, LoG, Prewitt and Roberts algorithms give similar results and show similarities in terms of the average of errors and accuracy. In addition, the results show that the minor difference of the average of the error and accuracy indices for Sobel, Canny, LoG, Prewitt and Roberts methods between both scenarios are not statistically significant, while the difference in the average of the error and accuracy indices for RGB-Sobel and Fuzzy methods between both scenarios are statistically significant. The accuracy of the algorithms can be improved by removing unwanted items such as vegetation and clouds in the sky. The evaluated algorithms assist practitioners to analyse their images collected day to day from construction sites, and to update building information modelling and the project digital drawings. Future work may need to focus on the combination of the evaluated algorithms using new data sets including colour edge detection for automatic defect identification using RGB and 360-degree images.
机译:使用非接触方法的施工缺陷检测自动化过程为质量控制和更新建筑信息建模提供了重要信息。模块化结构中的外部包层应在面板质量和适当的安装方面定期控制,因为它的外观对客户来说非常重要。然而,有限的计算方法用于以自动方式检查外部包层的安装​​问题。这些问题可能是面板的不正确坐姿,在外部包层的不同元素的面板或尺寸面上的仰角,划痕或裂缝中的不等关节。本文旨在展示七种算法来检测面板边缘,并通过应用于建筑地点的两种建筑方案的应用来统计地比较它们的性能。选择了两种不同的场景,其中建筑外观可供公众使用,并且使用最先进的3D相机进行100个图像的示例进行边缘检测分析。通过使用一系列计算误差和准确度分析和统计方法,包括均方误差,峰值信号到噪声比和结构相似性指数,验证了实验结果。图像处理算法的性能取决于图像的质量和所使用的算法。结果显示了模糊逻辑算法的更好性能,因为它检测到安装面板的清晰边缘。经典运营商在包括Sobel,Canny,Log,PREWITT和Roberts算法包括类似结果,并在误差和准确性方面提供相似性。此外,结果表明,两种情况之间的Sobel,Canny,Log,PREWITT和Roberts方法的误差和精度指数的平均差异没有统计学意义,而误差和准确性指标的平均值差异对于两个场景之间的RGB-Sobel和模糊方法是统计学意义。通过去除天空中的植被和云等不需要的物品,可以改善算法的准确性。评估的算法协助从业者分析日常从施工现场收集的图像,并更新建筑信息建模和项目数字图纸。未来的工作可能需要使用包括彩色边缘检测的新数据集来专注于评估算法的组合,包括使用RGB和360度图像自动缺陷识别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号