首页> 外文OA文献 >Variable-Speed Rotor Helicopters: Performance Comparison Between Continuously Variable and Fixed-Ratio Transmissions
【2h】

Variable-Speed Rotor Helicopters: Performance Comparison Between Continuously Variable and Fixed-Ratio Transmissions

机译:变速转子直升机:连续变量和固定比变速器之间的性能比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Variable speed rotor studies represent a promising research field for rotorcraft performance improvementudand fuel consumption reduction. The problems related to employing a main rotor variable speed areudnumerous and require an interdisciplinary approach. There are two main variable speed concepts,uddepending on the type of transmission employed: Fixed Ratio Transmission (FRT) and Continuously VariableudTransmission (CVT) rotors. The impact of the two types of transmission upon overall helicopter performanceudis estimated when both are operating at their optimal speeds. This is done by using an optimization strategyudable to find the optimal rotational speeds of main rotor and turboshaft engine for each flight condition. Theudprocess makes use of two different simulation tools: a turboshaft engine performance code and a helicopterudtrim simulation code for steady-state level flight. The first is a gas turbine performance simulator (TSHAFT)uddeveloped and validated at the University of Padova. The second is a simple tool used to evaluate the singleudblade forces and integrate them over the 360 degree-revolution of the main rotor, and thus to predict anudaverage value of the power load required by the engine. The results show that the FRT does not presentudsignificant performance differences compared to the CVT for a wide range of advancing speeds. However,udclose to the two conditions of maximum interest, i.e. hover and cruise forward flight, the discrepanciesudbetween the two transmission types become relevant: in fact, engine performance is found to be penalizedudby FRT, stating that significant fuel reductions can be obtained only by employing the CVT concept. In conclusion, FRT is a good way to reduce fuel consumption at intermediate advancing speeds; CVT advantages become relevant only near hover and high speed cruise conditions
机译:变速转子研究代表了旋翼飞机性能提升的有希望的研究领域 udand燃料消耗减少。与采用主转子变速有关的问题是 udnumor的并且需要跨学科方法。有两个主要的变速概念, Uddepending在使用的传输类型上:固定比率传输(FRT)和连续变量 UDTransmission(CVT)转子。两种类型传输对整体直升机性能的影响 UDIS估计两者都以其最佳速度运行。这是通过使用优化策略来完成的,以找到每个飞行条件的主转子和涡轮轴发动机的最佳转速。 udProcess利用两个不同的仿真工具:涡轮轴发动机性能码和稳态级飞行的直升机 udtrim仿真代码。首先是燃气轮机性能模拟器(TShaft) Uddeveloped并在帕多瓦大学验证。第二种是用于评估单个 UdBlade力的简单工具,并在主转子的360度旋转上集成它们,从而预测发动机所需的电力负载的 UDaverage值。结果表明,与CVT相比,FRT不存在 udsignight的性能差异,用于广泛的推进速度。但是, udclose到了最大利益的两个条件,即悬停和巡航前进飞行,两个传输类型的差异变得相关:事实上,发现发动机性能被罚款 udby frt,说明了显着的燃料减少只能通过采用CVT概念获得。总之,FRT是降低中间推进速度下燃料消耗的好方法; CVT的优点只有附近悬停和高速巡航条件相关

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号