首页> 外文OA文献 >The efficacy and tolerance of prone positioning in non-intubation patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS: a meta-analysis
【2h】

The efficacy and tolerance of prone positioning in non-intubation patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS: a meta-analysis

机译:急性缺氧呼吸衰竭和ARDS易于定位在非插管患者中的疗效和耐受性:META分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and aims: The application of prone positioning with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in non-intubation patients is increasing gradually, applying prone positioning for more high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) patients. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and tolerance of prone positioning combined with non-invasive respiratory support in patients with AHRF or ARDS. Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (prospective or retrospective cohort studies, RCTs and case series) published in PubMed , EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2020. We included studies that compared prone and supine positioning with non-invasive respiratory support in awake patients with AHRF or ARDS. The meta-analyses used random effects models. The methodological quality of the RCTs was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale. Results: A total of 16 studies fulfilled selection criteria and included 243 patients. The aggregated intubation rate and mortality rate were 33% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26–0.42, I 2  = 25%], 4% (95% CI: 0.01–0.07, I 2  = 0%), respectively, and the intolerance rate was 7% (95% CI: 0.01–0.12, I 2  = 5%). Prone positioning increased PaO 2 /FiO 2 [mean difference (MD) = 47.89, 95% CI: 28.12–67.66; p  5 h/day) were 34% and 21%, respectively; and the mortality rate of shorter duration prone (⩽5 h/day) and longer duration prone (>5 h/day) were 6% and 0%, respectively. PaO 2 /FiO 2 and SpO 2 were significantly improved in COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: Prone positioning could improve the oxygenation and reduce respiratory rate in both COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 patients with non-intubated AHRF or ARDS. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.
机译:背景和目标:在非插管患者中,易于定位与急性低氧呼吸呼吸衰竭(AHRF)或急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的应用逐渐增加,施加俯卧位定位对更多的高流量鼻氧治疗(HFNC)和非-Invasive通风(NIV)患者。该META分析评估了AHRF或ARDS患者在患者中与非侵袭性呼吸载体联合的效果和耐受性。方法:我们在2000年1月1日至7月1日,我们搜索了随机对照试验(RCT)(RCT)(预期或回顾性队列研究,RCTS和案例系列),从2000年1月1日至7月1日起,对受控试验的控制试验。我们包括比较易患的研究在清醒患者AHRF或ARDS中具有非侵袭性呼吸载体的仰卧定位。 Meta-Analyzes使用了随机效果模型。使用纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华质量评估规模评估RCT的方法论质量。结果:共有16项研究满足选择标准,包括243名患者。聚集的插管率和死亡率分别为33%[95%置信区间(CI):0.26-0.42,I 2 = 25%],4%(95%CI:0.01-0.07,I 2 = 0%),并且不耐受率为7%(95%CI:0.01-0.12,I 2 = 5%)。俯卧定位增加PAO 2 / FIO 2 [平均差异(MD)= 47.89,95%CI:28.12-67.66; p 5 h / day)分别为34%和21%;并且持续时间越慢的死亡率(⩽5h/日)和较长的持续时间(> 5 h /天)分别为6%和0%。 Covid-19患者和非Covid-19患者,PAO 2 / FIO 2和SPO 2显着改善。结论:俯卧定位可以改善氧化,降低Covid-19患者和非Covid-19患者的呼吸率,无加管AHRF或ARDS。本文的评论可通过“补充”材料段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号