首页> 外文OA文献 >Superiority of a Treat-to-Target Strategy over Conventional Treatment with Fixed csDMARD and Corticosteroids: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial in RA Patients with an Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic DMARDs, and New Therapy with Certolizumab Pegol
【2h】

Superiority of a Treat-to-Target Strategy over Conventional Treatment with Fixed csDMARD and Corticosteroids: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial in RA Patients with an Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic DMARDs, and New Therapy with Certolizumab Pegol

机译:用固定的CSDMARD和皮质类固定剂对常规治疗进行治疗对目标策略的优越性:RA患者的多中心随机对照试验,对常规合成DMARD的反应不足,以及与CERTOLIZUMAB PEGOL的新疗法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) includes the use of conventional (cs), biologic (b) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and oral, intramuscularly, intravenous, or intraarticular (IA) glucocorticoids (GCs). In this paper, we analysed whether a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy optimizing csDMARD, oral, and IA-GC treatment as an adjunct new therapy to a new certolizumab pegol (CZP) therapy improves the effectivity in RA patients. Methods: 43 patients with active RA (≥6 tender, ≥6 swollen joints, ESR ≥ 20 mm/h or CRP ≥ 7mg/L) despite csDMARD treatment for ≥ 3 months and naïve to bDMARDs were randomized to CZP (200 mg/2 weeks after loading with 400 mg at weeks 0–2–4) plus a treat-to-target strategy (T2T, n = 21), or to CZP added to the established csDMARD therapy (fixed regimen, n = 22). The T2T strategy consisted of changing the baseline csDMARD therapy (1) SC-methotrexate (dose: 15 ≥ 20 ≥ 25 mg/week, depending on the initial dose) ≥ leflunomide (20 mg/d) ≥ sulphasalazine (2 × 1000 mg/d) plus (2) oral GCs (prednisolone 20–15–12.5–10–7.5–5–2.5–0 mg/d tapered every five days) and (3) injections of ≤5 affected joints with triamcinolone. DMARD modification and an addition of oral GCs were initiated, depending on the achievement of low disease activity (DAS 28 < 3.2). The primary objective was defined as the ACR 50 response at week 24. Results: ACR 50 was achieved in 76.2% of the T2T, as compared to 36.4% of the fixed regimen patients (p = 0.020). ACR 20 and 70 responses were achieved in 90.5% and 71.4% of the T2T patients and 59.1% and 27.3% of the fixed regimen patients, respectively (p = 0.045 and p = 0.010, respectively). The adverse event rate was similar for both groups (T2T n = 51; fixed regimen n = 55). Conclusion: Treat-to-target management with the optimization of csDMARDs, oral, and IA-GCs of RA patients in parallel to a newly established CZP treatment was safe and efficacious in comparison to a fixed regimen of csDMARDs background therapy.
机译:背景:治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)包括使用常规(CS)的,生物(b)中的疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)和口服,肌内,静脉内,关节内或(IA)的糖皮质激素(GCS)。在本文中,我们分析了治疗到目标(T2T)策略优化csDMARD,口服和IA-GC治疗作为一种辅助的新疗法,以新的赛妥珠单抗(CZP)治疗能否改善RA患者的有效性。方法:43例活动RA(≥6嫩,≥6肿胀关节,ESR≥20毫米/小时或CRP≥为7mg / L)尽管csDMARD治疗≥3个月,幼稚到bDMARDs被随机CZP(200毫克/ 2周装载用400毫克在周0-2-4)加上一个治疗到目标的策略(T2T中,n = 21)后,或以CZP添加到已建立的csDMARD疗法(固定方案中,n = 22)。所述T2T战略包括改变基线csDMARD疗法(1)的SC-甲氨蝶呤(剂量:15≥20≥25毫克/周,这取决于初始剂量)≥来氟米特(20毫克/ d)≥柳氮磺胺吡啶(2×1000毫克/ d)加(2)口服的GC(泼尼松龙20-15-12.5-10-7.5-5-2.5-0毫克/ d锥形每5天)和≤5受影响的关节与曲安西龙(3)的注射。 DMARD修改和加法口服GC的被启动,这取决于低疾病活动的实现(DAS 28 <3.2)。主要目的被定义为在第24周的结果ACR 50应答:ACR 50中的T2T 76.2%达到了,相比于的固定方案的患者(P = 0.020)36.4%。 ACR 20和70个应答在90.5%和T2T患者为71.4%和59.1%和的固定方案的患者,27.3%分别达到(P = 0.045和p = 0.010,分别地)。不良事件率是两组相似(T2T N = 51;固定方案N = 55)。结论:把对目标管理与csDMARDs,口服和RA患者的IA-GC的平行于新成立的CZP治疗的优化是安全和有效的比较csDMARDs背景治疗的固定方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号