...
首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >Budget impact analysis of sarilumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to conventional synthetic DMARD or TNF inhibitor therapies
【24h】

Budget impact analysis of sarilumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to conventional synthetic DMARD or TNF inhibitor therapies

机译:sarilumab用于治疗类风湿性关节炎的预算影响分析,这些患者对常规合成DMARD或TNF抑制剂疗法的反应不足

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To estimate the 5-year budget impact (BI) on a US health plan of introducing sarilumab – a human immunoglobulin G1 anti-IL-6 receptor α monoclonal antibody – as combination treatment with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or monotherapy in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: BI analysis was conducted from a commercial payer perspective. Treatment-eligible populations included adult patients with moderate-to-severe RA and inadequate response (IR) to csDMARDs or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors-IR. All licensed biologic treatments recommended by the American College of Rheumatology guidelines were included. Results: For a hypothetical plan of one million members, 409 csDMARD-IR and 345 TNF-IR patients were annually eligible for combination therapy and 226 csDMARD and TNF-IR patients for monotherapy with sarilumab. Based on 2018 US direct treatment costs, the introduction of sarilumab was estimated to save $526,424, $322,637 and $264,306 over 5 years for csDMARD-IR combination therapy patients, TNF-IR combination therapy patients, and csDMARD-IR/TNF-IR monotherapy patients, respectively. As sarilumab absorbed a greater market share over the horizon, annual savings increased from years 1 to 5, $28,610 (–0.14%) to $194,646 (–0.83%) in csDMARD-IR, $16,986 (–0.11%) to $120,893 (–0.67%) in TNF-IR, and $14,256 (–0.13%) to $98,040 (–0.79%) in monotherapy. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the model was most sensitive to variations in sarilumab adherence. Conclusion: Total cost savings of introducing sarilumab to a health-care plan accrued from years 1 to 5, attributable to the lower treatment cost, stable dosing paradigm, and price parity for the two available doses (150 and 200 mg every 2 weeks) compared with alternative biologic DMARDs that have substantial variability in dose titration/schedules.
机译:目的:评估对美国卫生计划中引入sarilumab(一种人类免疫球蛋白G1抗IL-6受体α单克隆抗体)与常规合成抗病抗风湿药(csDMARDs)联合治疗的五年预算影响中度至重度类风湿关节炎(RA)的患者可采用单药或单药治疗。方法:从商业付款人的角度进行BI分析。符合治疗条件的人群包括中度至重度RA且对csDMARDs或肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α抑制剂-IR的反应不充分的成年患者。包括美国风湿病学会指南推荐的所有许可的生物治疗方法。结果:对于一个有100万成员的假设计划,每年有409例csDMARD-IR和345例TNF-IR患者有资格进行联合治疗,并有226例csDMARD和TNF-IR患者进行sarilumab单药治疗。根据2018年美国直接治疗费用,使用sarilumab估计在5年内为csDMARD-IR联合疗法患者,TNF-IR联合疗法患者和csDMARD-IR / TNF-IR单疗法患者节省526,424美元,322,637美元和264,306美元,分别。由于sarilumab吸收了更大的市场份额,因此每年节省的费用从1年增加到5年,在csDMARD-IR中从28,610美元(–0.14%)增加到194,646美元(–0.83%),从16,986美元(–0.11%)增加到120,893美元(–0.67%) )在TNF-IR中为$ 14,256(–0.13%)至$ 98,040(–0.79%)。单向敏感性分析表明,该模型对sarilumab依从性的变化最敏感。结论:将sarilumab引入健康计划的总成本节省是从1年到5年,这是由于与两种可用剂量(每2周150和200 mg)相比,治疗成本较低,剂量范例稳定且价格均等的缘故以及在剂量滴定/时间表方面有很大差异的其他生物DMARD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号