首页> 外文OA文献 >Technology Standard-Setting Under the Lens of Global Administrative Law: Accountability, Participation and Transparency of Standard-Setting Organizations
【2h】

Technology Standard-Setting Under the Lens of Global Administrative Law: Accountability, Participation and Transparency of Standard-Setting Organizations

机译:全球行政法镜片下的技术标准设置:标准制定组织的问责制,参与和透明度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The role of transnational non-governmental bodies in international standardization has often been in the limelight of recent academic discussions. While standards developed by Standard-Setting Organizations (SSOs) are typically non-binding, they can nevertheless acquire an obligatory character, either by virtue of the force given to them by domestic regulation or another organization such as the WTO, or by obtaining significant market power. Such metamorphosed standards, especially when developed in hybrid or private fora, are frequently accused of lacking legitimacy and accountability. In particular, these concerns are relevant for the technology sector, characterized by expertise-driven decision-making and the symbiosis of public and private stakeholders. This paper sheds light on the mechanics of technical standard-setting by analyzing the working procedures of the public, hybrid and private SSOs leading in telecommunications and ICT standardization, namely the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). It further suggests that despite the fundamental difference in the institutional nature of their forums, standards formulated by all three organizations constitute a collective action and fall within the scope of global administrative law. Ultimately, this paper attempts to reveal the principles, which could serve as administrative tools for scrutinizing the indirect powers of the SSOs, and to provide a preliminary comparative assessment of the examined procedures with regard to the identified principles.
机译:国际标准化跨国非政府组织的作用经常是在最近的学术讨论的风头。虽然标准的制定标准制定组织(标准制定组织)通常是没有约束力的,他们仍然可以获取强制性的性格,要么由于国内法规或世贸组织其他组织等给予他们的力量,或通过获得显著市场力量。尤其是在混合动力或私人论坛开发了这样变质的标准,经常被指责缺乏合法性和问责制。特别是,这些问题是相关的技术部门,其特点是专业知识驱动的决策以及公共和私人利益相关者的共生。本文阐明了技术标准制定的,通过分析公众,混合动力的工作程序和私人标准制定机构主导的电信和信息通信技术的标准化,即国际电信联盟(ITU),欧洲电信标准协会(ETSI)的力学和美国电气和电子工程师协会(IEEE)。这进一步表明,尽管在他们的论坛的体制性的根本区别,通过这三个组织制定标准构成了集体行动和秋季全球行政法的范围之内。最后,本文试图揭示的原则,这可以作为管理工具为审议本标准制定机构的间接权力,提供的检验程序进行初步比较评估方面的鉴定原则。

著录项

  • 作者

    Olia Kanevskaia;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:58:59

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号