首页> 外文OA文献 >‘Care for Outcomes’: systematic development of a set of outcome indicators to improve patient-relevant outcomes for patients with lung cancer
【2h】

‘Care for Outcomes’: systematic development of a set of outcome indicators to improve patient-relevant outcomes for patients with lung cancer

机译:'照顾结果':系统发展一系列结果指标,以改善肺癌患者的患者相关结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives Measuring quality of care is important, however many of the quality indicators used do not focus on outcome of treatment and aspects which are valuable for patients and physicians. The project ‘Care for Outcomes’ aims to establish a relevant set of outcome indicators for lung cancer.Setting Network of seven large, non-university teaching hospitals in the Netherlands (Santeon).Methods By reviewing the literature, a list of potential outcome indicators for patients with lung cancer was composed and subsequently prioritised by expert’s opinion. Three external parties, with expertise on lung cancer, clinical management and public health, evaluated and reduced the list of indicators to a working set. Finally, the resulting selection of outcome indicators was tested for feasibility and discrimination in patient data, by collecting retrospective data and performing regression and survival analyses.Participants Development of the indicator set in six Santeon hospitals. Retrospective cohort study in 5922 patients diagnosed with lung cancer (all types and stages).Results Selected outcome indicators were divided into three levels of outcome (tiers). The first tier about survival and the process of recovery include mortality, survival, positive resection margins, rethoracotomy after resection and quality of life at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months. Tier 2 concerning the sustainability of the recovery include complications after resection and toxicity after chemotherapy and/or radiation. Tier 3 about sustainability of health revealed no measurable outcomes. The retrospective data collection showed differences between hospitals and variation in case mix.Conclusion A relevant set of outcome indicators for lung cancer was systematically developed. This set has the potential to compare quality of care between hospitals and inform patients with lung cancer about outcomes. The project is ongoing in the current Santeon Value-Based Health Care programme through quality and improvement cycles.
机译:目标衡量医疗质量是很重要的,但是很多使用不注重治疗和这对患者和医生有价值的方面的成果的质量指标。该项目的关爱结果“旨在建立一套相关的成果指标的七大,非大学教学医院肺cancer.Setting网络荷兰(Santeon)。方法通过文献回顾,一个可能的结果指标清单对于肺癌患者组成,后经专家的意见优先。三个外部各方,对肺癌,临床管理和公共卫生,评估和指标清单减少到一个工作组的专业知识。最后,得到的结果指标选择对患者数据的可行性和歧视进行了测试,通过收集回顾性资料,并进行六家Santeon医院的指标集的回归和生存analyses.Participants发展。在诊断为肺癌患者5922回顾性队列研究(所有类型和阶段)。结果选定结果指标分为三个等级结果(层级)。关于存活和恢复的过程中,第一层包括在基线和3,6和12个月后死亡,存活,正切缘,rethoracotomy切除和生活质量后。关于恢复的可持续性方法2包括化疗和/或放疗后切除和毒性后的并发症。第3层关于健康的可持续性显示没有可衡量的结果。回顾性收集数据显示的情况下,mix.Conclusion一组相关的成果指标医院和变化之间的差异对肺癌进行了系统的开发。这样设置有医院之间比较医疗质量和告知患者有关的结果肺癌的可能性。该项目通过质量和改进周期持续在目前的基于价值的Santeon保健方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号