首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating risk for targeted violence in schools: Comparing risk assessment, threat assessment, and other approaches
【2h】

Evaluating risk for targeted violence in schools: Comparing risk assessment, threat assessment, and other approaches

机译:评估学校针对性暴力的风险:比较风险评估,威胁评估和其他方法

摘要

In the wake of recent school shootings, fear over violence in schools has prompted increased requests for psychologists, educators, and law enforcement professionals to assist in preventing future school violence incidents.We attempt to lay a foundation for developing effective assessment and prevention approaches by first distinguishing planned school-based attacks from other forms of school and youth violence. We then review the three assessment approaches that have been advocated and used in some jurisdictions (profiling, guided professional judgment, automated decision-making) and demonstrate why they are inappropriate—and potentially harmful—in preventing planned school-based attacks.We then describe the contours of the threat assessment approach, developed by the U.S. Secret Service to prevent assassinations, and examine its utility for responding to communications or behaviors of concern that students may present in school settings. © 2001 John Wiley u26 Sons, Inc.
机译:在最近发生学校枪击事件后,对学校暴力的恐惧促使对心理学家,教育工作者和执法专业人员的要求增加,以协助预防未来发生学校暴力事件。我们试图为首先开发有效的评估和预防方法奠定基础将计划中的学校袭击与其他形式的学校暴力和青少年暴力区别开来。然后,我们回顾了在某些辖区中倡导和使用的三种评估方法(分析,指导性专业判断,自动决策),并说明了为什么它们在防止计划中的基于学校的攻击中是不合适的,并且可能有害。美国特勤局为防止暗杀而开发的威胁评估方法的轮廓,并研究了其对学生在学校环境中可能出现的关注交流或举止做出反应的效用。 ©2001 John Wiley u26 Sons,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号