首页> 外文OA文献 >Does injury pattern among major road trauma patients influence prehospital transport decisions regardless of the distance to the nearest trauma centre? – a retrospective study
【2h】

Does injury pattern among major road trauma patients influence prehospital transport decisions regardless of the distance to the nearest trauma centre? – a retrospective study

机译:主要道路创伤患者之间的伤害模式是否会影响到最近的创伤中心的距离? - 回顾性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Prehospital undertriage occurs when the required level of care for a major trauma patient is underestimated and the patient is transported to a lower-level emergency care facility. One possible reason is that the pattern of injuries exceeding a certain severity threshold is not easily recognizable in the field. The present study aims to examine whether the injury patterns of major road trauma patients are associated with trauma centre transport decisions in Sweden, controlling for the distance from the crash to the nearest trauma centre and other patient characteristics. Methods The Swedish Traffic Accident Data Acquisition (STRADA) database was queried from April 2011 to March 2017. Teaching hospitals with neurosurgery capabilities were classified as trauma centres (TC), all other hospitals were classified as other emergency departments (ED). Injury Severity Score ≥ 13 was used as the threshold for major trauma. Ten common injury patterns were derived from the STRADA data; six patterns included serious neuro trauma to the head or spine. The remaining four patterns were: other severe injuries, moderate to serious abdomen injuries, serious thorax injuries and all other remaining injury patterns. Logistic regression was used to analyse the effect of injury patterns, age, sex and distance from crash to nearest TC on transport decision (TC or ED). Results Of the 2542 patients, 38.0% were transported to a TC, equating to a prehospital undertriage of 62%. Over half (59.4%) of the patients had four or more Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2+ injuries. After controlling for age, sex and distance to nearest TC, only patients sustaining serious head injuries together with other severe injuries had significantly higher odds of being transported to a TC (OR = 4.18, 95% CI: 2.03, 8.73). The odds of being transported to a TC decreased by 5% with every kilometre further away the crash location was to the nearest TC. Conclusion These results highlight that there is considerable prehospital undertriage in Sweden and suggest that distance to nearest TC is more influential in transport decisions than injury pattern. These results can be used to further develop prehospital transportation guidelines and designation of trauma centres.
机译:当照顾一个重大创伤病人所需要的水平被低估,病人被输送到一个较低的水平,紧急护理设施发生抽象的背景院前undertriage。一个可能的原因是,损伤超过某一阈值的严重程度的图案没有在现场容易辨认。本研究的目的是审查是否主要道路创伤患者的损伤模式与在瑞典的创伤中心的运输相关的决策,控制了从崩溃到最近的创伤中心和其他病人的特点的距离。方法瑞典交通事故数据采集(STRADA)数据库是从2011年4月查询,以2017年三月教学医院神经外科与能力被列为创伤中心(TC),所有其他医院被列为其他紧急部门(ED)。损伤严重度评分≥13被用作主要创伤阈值。十大常见的损伤图案与STRADA数据导出;六种模式包括严重的神经损伤头部或脊椎。其余四种模式分别为:其他严重受伤,中度严重的腹部受伤,严重受伤胸腔和所有其他剩余的损伤类型。采用Logistic回归分析的损伤类型,年龄,性别和距离崩溃到最近的TC运输的决定(TC或ED)的影响。结果2542名患者中,38.0%被运送到一个TC,相当于62%的院前undertriage。超过一半的患者(59.4%)有四个或更多的简易创伤量表(AIS)2+受伤。在控制了年龄,性别和距离最近的TC后,只有与其他严重受伤头部严重受伤在一起患者被输送到TC显著较高赔率(OR = 4.18,95%CI:2.03,8.73)。被输送到TC赔率与每公里下降了5%,进一步远离碰撞位置是最近的TC。结论这些结果强调有瑞典的院前相当,并undertriage建议最近的TC是在运输的决策比受伤模式更具影响力的距离。这些结果可用于进一步开发院前交通指引及创伤中心的指定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号