首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of vascular stiffness using different modalities in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a case control study
【2h】

Assessment of vascular stiffness using different modalities in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a case control study

机译:利用全身狼疮红斑狼疮患者的不同方式评估血管刚度:案例对照研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Accurate risk stratification would require a simple, non-invasive index integrating all traditional and emerging risk factors. Vascular stiffness fulfills these requirements and has better predictive value for cardiovascular events than traditional risk factors in hypertensives and patients with coronary artery disease. Our aim was to determine whether arterial stiffness is increased in SLE patients compared to healthy controls and to correlate the arterial stiffness in SLE patients with cardiovascular risk factors, namely, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Results This study included 50 SLE patients and 50 age- and gender-matched healthy individuals. SLE patients had higher median aortic stiffness index (SI) and lower strain and distensibility, compared to controls (p value for all < 0.001). SLE patients had significantly impaired flow-mediated dilation (FMD) compared to controls: the median (range) in SLE patients was 8.82 (2.5–21.87), compared to 19 (12–37.5) in controls (z = − 7.695, p ˂ 0.001). Regarding quality arterial stiffness (QAS) parameters, SLE patients had significantly lower median carotid distension, distensibility coefficient, and compliance coefficient, with higher median carotid SI, carotid pulse wave velocity (PWV), and augmentation index (AI), compared to controls (p value for all ≤ 0.001). SLE patients had a higher median cf-PWV 6.5 m/s (4.8–11.8), compared to a median of 4.6 m/s (3.8–6.9) in controls (z = − 8.193, p ˂ 0.001). Linear regression analysis to adjust for hypertension and diabetes mellitus yielded a statistically significant difference between both groups for all of the above parameters (p = 0.014 for maximum carotid intima media thickness (IMT) and < 0.001 for remaining parameters), with the exception of the maximum carotid augmentation index (p = 0.184). Conclusion SLE patients have significantly increased arterial stiffness and impaired FMD compared to healthy controls. This is true even after adjusting for hypertension and diabetes mellitus, highlighting the fact that SLE could be an independent cardiovascular risk factor. These findings emphasize the need for early management of SLE together with aggressive risk factor modification.
机译:摘要背景心血管疾病是系统性狼疮(SLE)患者的发病率和死亡率的主要原因。准确的风险分层需要一个简单,无侵入性指数,整合所有传统和新兴的风险因素。血管僵硬满足这些要求,并且具有比传统风险因素和冠状动脉疾病患者的传统风险因素更好的心血管事件预测值。我们的宗旨是确定SLE患者中的动脉僵硬是否增加,与健康对照相比,并将动脉僵硬于SLE心血管危险因素,即高血压和糖尿病相关。结果本研究包括50名SLE患者和50岁和性别匹配的健康个体。与对照相比与对照组相比,SLE患者具有显着损害的流量介导的扩张(FMD):SLE患者中的中值(范围)为8.82(2.5-21.87),与19(12-37.5)相比(Z = - 7.695,P˂ 0.001)。关于质量动脉僵硬度(QAS)参数,SLE患者中位数颈动脉扩张,呼吸速度和依从系数显着降低,与对照相比,颈动脉态SI,颈动脉脉冲波速度(PWV)和增强指数(AI)具有更高的中位数颈动脉SI,颈动脉脉搏波速度(PWV)和增强指数(AI)( P值全≤0.001)。 SLE患者的中位数CF-PWV 6.5 m / s(4.8-11.8),与对照中的4.6 m / s(3.8-6.9)中位数相比(z = - 8.193,p = 0.001)。用于调节高血压和糖尿病的线性回归分析在所有上述参数之间产生统计学上显着的差异(对于最大颈动脉内膜介质厚度(IMT)和<0.001,剩余参数的<0.001),除了最大颈动脉增强指数(P = 0.184)。结论SLE患者的动脉僵硬度显着增加,与健康对照相比,FMD受损。即使在调整高血压和糖尿病后,这也是如此,突出显示SLE可能是独立的心血管危险因素。这些调查结果强调了对SLE的早期管理的需求,以及积极的风险因素修饰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号