首页> 外文OA文献 >‘To protect my health, or to protect my health data?’ udEexamining the influence of health information privacy concerns on citizens’ health technology adoption.ud
【2h】

‘To protect my health, or to protect my health data?’ udEexamining the influence of health information privacy concerns on citizens’ health technology adoption.ud

机译:“为了保护我的健康,或保护我的健康数据?” ud重新审视健康信息隐私问题对公民健康技术采用的影响。 ud

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study conducts a holistic investigation of citizens’ health information privacy concerns (HIPC). Specifically, it develops a framework for examining the drivers, dimensions, and outcomes of HIPC. It is proposed that HIPC are formed from individuals’ characteristics, perceptions, and experiences. HIPC are expected to reduce individuals’ intentions (1) to accept Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and (2) to adopt mobile health (mHealth) solutions.udTo explore these assumptions, the study utilises a three-stage sequential mixed methods approach. In the first stage, exploratory interviews were conducted to refine the proposed framework. In the second stage, the hypothesised relationships in the framework were empirically tested, using a survey of 445 citizens in Ireland and the United States. In the third stage, in-depth interviews were conducted with 50 citizens in both countries to further explore these relationships. The quantitative and qualitative findings were then integrated to elucidate the underpinnings of HIPC.udThe integrated findings show that citizens’ HIPC are shaped by characteristics such as age and healthcare need, perceptions of trust, risk, and sensitivity, and experience of privacy media coverage. HIPC reduces adoption intentions, and influences the type of mHealth solution citizens are willing to adopt, as well as the type and volume of data disclosed. Perceived hedonic and utilitarian benefits positively influence adoption intentions, but in order to sustain this influence, these benefits must remain relevant to the individual.udThe study provides detailed insights into how citizens’ HIPC are developed, and how along with perceived benefits, they can influence adoption intentions and subsequent use behaviours. It also extends the Information Boundary theory (Petronio, 1991), Protection Motivation theory (Rogers, 1975), and Privacy Calculus theory (Culnan 1993) to the health information privacy context. The study’s findings provide actionable insights which can assist health organisations and technology companies in addressing citizens’ HIPC more successfully.
机译:这项研究对公民的健康信息隐私问题(HIPC)进行了全面调查。具体而言,它开发了一个框架来检查重债穷国的动因,规模和成果。建议重债穷国由个人的特征,看法和经验组成。 HIPC有望减少个人的意图(1)接受电子健康记录(EHR)和(2)采用移动健康(mHealth)解决方案。 ud为了探索这些假设,本研究采用了三阶段顺序混合方法。在第一阶段,进行了探索性访谈以完善建议的框架。在第二阶段,通过对爱尔兰和美国的445名公民进行调查,对框架中的假设关系进行了实证检验。在第三阶段,对两国的50名公民进行了深入访谈,以进一步探讨这些关系。然后,将定量和定性调查结果进行整合,以阐明重债穷国的基础。 ud综合调查结果表明,公民的重债穷国受到年龄和医疗保健需求,信任感,风险和敏感性的感知以及隐私媒体报道的经验的影响。重债穷国减少了采用意愿,并影响了市民愿意采用的移动医疗解决方案的类型,以及所披露数据的类型和数量。享乐享乐主义和功利主义的感知收益积极地影响了收养意图,但为了维持这种影响,这些收益必须与个人保持相关。 ud该研究提供了有关公民的重债穷国如何发展以及如何与感知的收益一起的详细见解。影响采用意图和随后的使用行为。它还将信息边界理论(Petronio,1991),保护动机理论(Rogers,1975)和隐私演算理论(Culnan 1993)扩展到健康信息隐私环境。该研究结果提供了可付诸实践的见解,可以帮助卫生组织和科技公司更成功地解决公民的重债穷国。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kenny Grace;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号