首页> 外文OA文献 >What is the impact of contraceptive methods and mixes of contraceptive methods on contraceptive prevalence, unmet need for family planning, and unwanted and unintended pregnancies?
【2h】

What is the impact of contraceptive methods and mixes of contraceptive methods on contraceptive prevalence, unmet need for family planning, and unwanted and unintended pregnancies?

机译:避孕方法和避孕方法的混合对避孕普及率,未满足的计划生育需求以及意外和意外怀孕有何影响?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background - In many low-and middle-income countries, there is high maternal, infant and child mortality due in part to low contraceptive use and high unmet need for family planning. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews is to synthesise the findings of systematic reviews conducted in this area to assess the impact of various contraceptive methods and mixes of contraceptive methods on contraceptive prevalence, unwanted and unintended pregnancies, and unmet need (a desire to limit the number of children but not currently using any contraception) for family planning in developing countries/regions.Methods - Eight databases (Bioline international, The Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature - LILACS, Popline, PubMed, Turning Research Into Practice, World Health Organisation Reproductive Health Library and Zetoc) were searched from 28 October 2010 to 08 December 2010. Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews were included. Eligible reviews included studies whose participants were sexually active women or men from countries classified as ‘developing’, ‘low-income’ or ‘middle-income’. Systematic reviews of any intervention (or combination of interventions) designed to increase contraceptive prevalence, reduce fertility or both were eligible. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, AMSTAR, was used to evaluate the quality of the included systematic reviews, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the quality of the body of evidence for each comparison. To aid the interpretation of the findings for a variety of settings, relevant contextual information was presented where possible.Results - There were 22 systematic reviews included in this overview of reviews. The overview examined a range of contraceptive methods, including modern (terminal and spacing) and traditional methods (such as withdrawal and periodic abstinence which do not require contraceptive substances or devices and also do not require clinical procedures). However, the systematic reviews included did not address all the objectives of the overview.The results of the review are summarised below according to the objectives.Objective 1: To assess the impact of various contraceptive methods and mixes ofcontraceptive methods on contraceptive prevalence in developing countries/regions. There was no systematic review that met this objective.Objective 2: To assess the impact of various contraceptive methods and mixes ofcontraceptive methods on unwanted and unintended pregnancies in developingcountries/regions.The body of evidence for the relative efficacy or effectiveness of a variety ofcontraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy in developing countries was generally rated as of low or moderate quality. There was, however, a number of comparisons (between different derivatives of the same contraceptive methods) for which the evidence was rated as of high or moderate quality. Evidence from systematic reviews is lacking on the acceptability of contraceptive methods and their impact on prevalence and on unmet needs for family planning. The evidence for the relative effectiveness of a variety of contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy in developing countries is generally of low quality. There is some high-quality evidence comparing different derivatives of the same contraceptive methods, although this is more often evidence of efficacy than evidence of effectiveness.Objective 3: To assess the impact of various contraceptive methods and mixes ofcontraceptive methods on unmet need for family planning in developing countries/regions.There was no systematic review that met this objective.
机译:背景-在许多低收入和中等收入国家,孕产妇,婴儿和儿童的死亡率很高,部分原因是避孕药具使用率低和计划生育需求未得到满足。本系统综述的目的是综合在该领域进行的系统评价的结果,以评估各种避孕方法和各种避孕方法对避孕普及率,意外怀孕和意外怀孕以及未满足的需求的影响(限制的愿望)。方法-八个数据库(Bioline International,Cochrane图书馆,拉丁美洲和加勒比海健康科学文献-LILACS,Popline,PubMed,将研究转化为实践)用于计划生育的儿童数量,但目前尚未使用任何避孕措施,从2010年10月28日至2010年12月8日在世界卫生组织生殖健康图书馆和Zetoc进行了搜索。其中包括Cochrane和非Cochrane系统评价。符合条件的评论包括研究对象为来自“发展中”,“低收入”或“中等收入”国家的性活跃女性。对旨在提高避孕普及率,降低生育力或两者兼有的任何干预措施(或干预措施的组合)进行系统评价。提取数据并进行叙述性合成。评估系统评估的评估工具AMSTAR用于评估所纳入系统评估的质量,推荐,评估,发展和评估的等级(GRADE)用于评估每次比较的证据主体的质量。为了帮助解释各种情况下的发现,在可能的情况下,还提供了相关的上下文信息。结果-该评论概述包含22个系统评论。概述检查了一系列避孕方法,包括现代(终端和间隔)避孕方法和传统方法(例如停药和定期戒酒,这些方法不需要避孕药具或器械,也不需要临床程序)。然而,所包括的系统评价并未解决概述的所有目标。根据目的将评价结果总结如下。目标1:评估各种避孕方法和避孕方法组合对发展中国家避孕普及率的影响/区域。没有系统的综述可以达到这个目的。目标2:评估各种避孕方法和各种避孕方法对发展中国家/地区不必要和意外怀孕的影响。各种避孕方法相对有效性或有效性的证据在发展中国家,预防怀孕的质量通常被评为低或中等。但是,有许多比较(在相同避孕方法的不同衍生物之间),其证据被评定为高质量或中等质量。缺乏系统评价的证据表明避孕方法的可接受性及其对流行率和计划生育未满足需求的影响。各种避孕方法在发展中国家预防怀孕的相对有效性的证据通常质量低下。有一些高质量的证据可以比较同一避孕方法的不同衍生物,尽管这通常是有效性的证据,而不是有效性的证据。目标3:评估各种避孕方法和避孕方法组合对计划生育未满足需求的影响在发展中国家/地区。没有实现这一目标的系统审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号