首页> 外文OA文献 >The Cultural Politics of Proprietorship: The Socio-historical Evolution of Japanese Swordsmanship and its Correlation with Cultural Nationalism
【2h】

The Cultural Politics of Proprietorship: The Socio-historical Evolution of Japanese Swordsmanship and its Correlation with Cultural Nationalism

机译:私有制的文化政治:日本剑术的社会历史演变及其与文化民族主义的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis provides a detailed socio-historical analysis of the evolutionary process of traditional Japanese swordsmanship (kenjutsu) from the inception of distinct martial schools (bugei-ryuha) in the fourteenth century, to its gradual progression into a modern competitive sport (kendo), and a subject of study in the current Japanese education system. The following questions with regards to the development of Japanese swordsmanship were analysed: 1) How did schools dedicated to the study of martial arts (bugei-ryuha) evolve, and why was the sword so important to the early traditions? 2) What was the process in which kenjutsu become “civilised”, and how did it relate to class identity in the Tokugawa period (1600-1868)? 3) In what way did kenjutsu transmute when class distinctions and national isolationist policies (sakoku) were abolished in the Meiji period (1868–1912)? 4) What were the cultural and political influences in the rise of “state” and “popular” nationalism, and how did they affect the “re-invention” and manipulation of kendo in the first half of the twentieth century? 5) How did post-war private and national cultural policy affect the reinstatement of kendo and its usefulness in inculcating a sense of “Japaneseness”? 6) What are the nationalistic motivations, and perceived dangers of the international propagation of kendo with regards to cultural propriotership?Through applying socio-historical concepts such as Norbert Elias’s “civilising process” and Eric Hobsbawm’s “invention of tradition”, as well as various descriptions of nationalism to the evolution of kendo, this thesis demonstrates how the martial art has continued to maintain a connection withthe past, while simultaneously developing into a symbolic and discursive form of traditional culture representing a “cultural ethos” considered to be a manifestation of “Japaneseness”. Ultimately, kendo can be described as a kind of participatory based mind-body Nihonjinron. Japan’s current reaction as it ponders the repercussions if it were to somehow lose its status as the suzerain nation of kendo,i.e. as exclusive owners of kendo - a martial art perceived as one of the most representative forms oftraditional Japanese culture – is also assessed in this thesis.
机译:本论文对传统日本剑术(kenjutsu)的演变过程进行了详细的社会历史分析,从14世纪成立独特的武术学校(bugei-ryuha)到逐步发展为现代竞技运动(kendo),并且是当前日本教育体系中的一个研究主题。分析了有关日本剑术发展的以下问题:1)致力于武术研究的学校是如何发展的?为什么剑对早期传统如此重要? 2)剑术“文明化”的过程是什么,它与德川时代(1600-1868年)的阶级身份有什么关系? 3)在明治时代(1868–1912年)废除了阶级区分和民族孤立主义政策(sakoku)后,kenjutsu会以何种方式转变? 4)“国家”和“大众”民族主义兴起对文化和政治产生了哪些影响,它们如何影响二十世纪上半叶对剑道的“重新发明”和操纵? 5)战后的私人和国家文化政策如何影响剑道的恢复及其在灌输“日本性”感方面的作用? 6)在文化专有权方面,剑道的国际传播动机是什么,剑道在国际上的传播有哪些危险?通过运用社会历史概念,例如诺伯特·埃里亚斯(Norbert Elias)的“文明进程”和埃里克·霍布斯鲍姆(Eric Hobsbawm)的“传统发明”,以及各种在描述民族主义对剑道的演变过程中,本论文展示了武术如何继续与过去保持联系,同时又发展成为象征性和话语形式的传统文化,代表着一种“文化精神”,被视为“文化精神”的体现。日本性”。归根结底,剑道可以说是一种基于参与的心智体Nihonjinron。日本目前的反应是,如果它想以某种方式失去作为剑道的宗主国的地位,即在思考后果。本文还评估了剑道的独家拥有者-一种被认为是日本传统文化中最具代表性的形式之一的武术。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bennett Alexander Campbell;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号