首页> 外文OA文献 >The choice of China's Business Tax to Value Added Tax reform: the traditional VAT model or the modern GST model?
【2h】

The choice of China's Business Tax to Value Added Tax reform: the traditional VAT model or the modern GST model?

机译:中国营业税向增值税改革的选择:传统的增值税模式还是现代的商品及服务税模式?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

By implementing the Pilot Program for the Collection of Value Added Tax instead of Business Tax, China has started a move to a Value Added Tax (VAT). There were two models of VAT/Goods and Services Tax (GST) available to policymakers: the traditional VAT model and the modern GST model. VATs adopted in the European Union are the typical examples of using the traditional VAT model, whereas the GST system introduced in 1986 in New Zealand is regarded as the leading example of the modern GST model.This research aims to determine which model China should use going forward to develop further its VAT regime, and provide recommendations for future reforms. First, the thesis introduces the theory and history of VAT, and discusses Adam Smith's four principles of taxation, which are equity, certainty, convenience, and efficiency, along with the principles of simplicity and neutrality. These principles are crucial due to the fact that they are the standard criteria used to evaluate a tax regime. In addition to these principles, debates over the tax base (wide or narrow), tax rate (single or multiple), and the registration threshold (high or low), are also discussed.Second, this research examines three VAT/GST systems, namely, China's VAT system, the European Union's VAT system, and New Zealand's GST system, in terms of the tax base, tax rate structure, and the registration approach.Finally, the results of this research show that China chose the traditional VAT model to develop its new VAT regime. By conducting research on the modern GST model, it is suggested that the single tax rate structure and a broad tax base are the essential requirements for an ideal VAT/GST system. In the light of the status quo, the culture of Chinese society may not suit the modern GST system as used in New Zealand because the tax collection and administration level is not at a high standard in China. On the basis that the researcher believes the modern GST model is the best model for China, policymakers in China could develop its VAT by gradually moving towards the modern GST model.All the laws and exchange rates used in this thesis are as at 12 February 2016.
机译:通过实施增值税征税试点计划,而不是营业税,中国已开始转向增值税。决策者可以使用两种增值税/商品和服务税(GST)模型:传统增值税模型和现代GST模型。欧盟采用的增值税是使用传统增值税模式的典型例子,而1986年在新西兰引入的商品及服务税制度则被认为是现代商品及服务税模式的主要例子。期望进一步发展其增值税制度,并为未来的改革提供建议。首先,论文介绍了增值税的理论和历史,并讨论了亚当·斯密的征税四项原则,即公平,确定性,便利性和效率,以及简单性和中立性。这些原则之所以至关重要,是因为它们是评估税收制度的标准标准。除了这些原则外,还讨论了税基(宽或窄),税率(单或多)和注册阈值(高或低)的争论。其次,本研究考察了三种增值税/消费税制度,从税收基础,税率结构和注册方式等方面来看,分别是中国的增值税制度,欧盟的增值税制度和新西兰的商品及服务税制度。最后,研究结果表明,中国选择了传统的增值税模式发展新的增值税制度。通过对现代商品及服务税模型的研究,建议单一税率结构和广泛的税基是理想的增值税/商品及服务税系统的基本要求。根据现状,由于中国的税收征收和管理水平不高,中国社会的文化可能不适合新西兰使用的现代商品及服务税体系。基于研究人员认为现代商品及服务税模型是中国最好的模型,中国的政策制定者可以逐步向现代商品及服务税模型发展增值税。本文使用的所有法律和汇率均为2016年2月12日的汇率。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zhong Hao;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号