首页> 外文OA文献 >Studies on the biology of soil-dwelling nematodes of tussock grassland
【2h】

Studies on the biology of soil-dwelling nematodes of tussock grassland

机译:丛草草原土壤线虫生物学研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Tussock grassland is the indigenous grassland of New Zealand. It covers one-fifth of the land area and is related to the "steppes" of the northern hemisphere (Zotov, 1939; Allan, 1946). Two types of grassland exist; tall tussock grassland which is dominated by plants of Chionochloa species, and low tussock grassland which is dominated by bunch grasses of Festuca and Poa species (Barker, 1953). The low tussock grasslands occur mainly in the South Island, covering almost five million hectares (Cockayne and Levy, 1956). During the early period of European settlement and agricultural development, montane tussock grasslands represented one of the few natural resources that maintained agricultural production without modification (Cockayne, 1915); but continued mismanagement by burning and overgrazing led to changes in species composition, and to deterioration and erosion in many areas (Cockayne A., 1910,1915; Cockayne, 1919a, 1919b; Zotov, 1938; Cumberland, 1945; Raeside and Gibbs, 1945). With a steady decline in the relative value of production from the high country grasslands, and a growing realization of the importance of soil and water conservation, interest in the ecology of tussock grasslands intensified through the 1950's, culminating in the formation of the Tussock Grasslands and Mountain Lands Institute in 1960. The ecological problems of tussock grassland management are well documented (see Hercus, 1956; Drummond and Leatham, 1959; McCaskill, 1963; O'Connor, 1966; Tussock Grasslands and Mountain Lands Institute Review, 1961-1970). However apart from entomological considerations (Dick, 1940; Kelsey, 1957), studies on the soil fauna and micro-flora were neglected until Thornton (1958a) introduced a co-ordinated effort by a group of workers on the biology of tussock grasslands soils. The programme included investigations on distribution and population dynamics of fungi (Thornton, 1958b), yeasts (Di Menna, 1958), bacteria (Stout, 1958a; Ross, 1958), protozoa (Stout, 1958b), streptomycetes (Vernon, 1958), algae (Flint, 1958) and earthworms (Lee, 1958), with respect to three tussock grassland soils. This was followed by a parallel study of fungi (Thornton, 1960b), yeasts (Di Menna, 1960), bacteria (Stout, 1960a; Ross, 1960) and protozoa (stout, 1960b) in cultivated and uncultivated tussock grassland soils (Thornton, 1960a). Subsequent work on the bacterial flora was carried out by Robinson (1962) and Robinson and MacDonald (1964). More recently, attention has been drawn to the problems involved in the establishment of legumes and nodule-forming bacteria in tussock soils (e.g. Blair, 1967; Adams and Lowther, 1970). Knowledge of several groups of organisms in high country soils is lacking (Hayward, 1967), nematodes included. Nematodes constitute an important part of the soil fauna... “being more numerous than any other animal of comparable size. Obviously they must be considered in any comprehensive study of soil biology,” (Christie, 1959). The present project was initiated with the support of the Miss E. L. Hellaby Indigenous Grasslands Research Trust, to investigate the biology of nematodes in a tussock grassland soil. From an agriculturist's viewpoint, ecological research is essential to the understanding of nematodes as factors in the biology of the soil, and to the interpretation of plant-nematode interactions in the aetiology of plant disease. Despite the significance of such studies and the increasing interest in soil biology, there are many gaps in current knowledge. As might be expected, the economically important plant parasitic nematodes have received most attention (e.g. Dropkin, 1955; Christie, 1959; Jones, 1959, 1965; Seinhorst, 1961; Thorne, 1961; Oostenbrink, 1966; Jenkins and Taylor, 1967; Paramonov, 1968); for more general reviews see Nielsen, (1949,1967), Winslow (1960), and Wallace (1963). Although there is a considerable volume of literature on various aspects of nematode ecology there have been few attempts to interpret pattern and process in a nematode population as a whole. Too often, ecological discussion is restricted to consideration of physico-chemical factors on populations without due regard to the ecology of the species involved and their interactions with the various components of the soil fauna and flora. In view of the lack of information on nematodes in tussock grassland soils in New Zealand, and the lack of understanding of many aspects of nematode ecology in general, studies were undertaken, with the following objectives: i)to consider the interrelationships between nematodes and the soil fauna and flora under laboratory conditions, and to study the biology of species representing a range of ecological niches in the soil; ii)to investigate nematodes in the field situation by considering the distribution and annual variation of the populations with regard to changes in biotic and abiotic factors of the environment and the biology of the species involved; iii)to investigate the significance of plant parasitic nematodes in causing damage to tussock grassland plants.
机译:Tussock草原是新西兰的本土草原。它占陆地面积的五分之一,与北半球的“草原”有关(Zotov,1939年; Allan,1946年)。存在两种草原。高草丛的草地主要是千鸟属种类的植物,低草丛的草地主要是Festuca和Poa种类的草丛(Barker,1953年)。低草丛草原主要发生在南岛,占地近500万公顷(Cockayne和Levy,1956年)。在欧洲定居和农业发展的早期,山地草丛草原是为数不多的保持农业生产不变的自然资源之一(Cockayne,1915年)。但是由于焚烧和过度放牧而导致的管理不善导致物种组成发生变化,并在许多地区造成恶化和侵蚀(Cockayne A.,1910,1915; Cockayne,1919a​​,1919b; Zotov,1938; Cumberland,1945; Raeside和Gibbs,1945 )。随着高地草原的相对产值不断下降,水土保持的重要性日益提高,对草丛草地生态的兴趣在1950年代开始增强,最终形成了草丛草地和1960年的芒特兰兹土地研究所。关于草丛草地管理的生态问题已有详尽的文献记载(参见Hercus,1956年; Drummond和Leatham,1959年;麦卡斯基尔,1963年;奥康纳,1966年;《草丛草原和芒特兰兹土地研究所评论》,1961-1970年)。 。但是,除了昆虫学方面的考虑(Dick,1940; Kelsey,1957)外,对土壤动物和微生物区系的研究一直被忽略,直到Thornton(1958a)提出了一群工人对草丛草地土壤生物学的共同努力。该计划包括真菌(Thornton,1958b),酵母菌(Di Menna,1958),细菌(Stout,1958a; Ross,1958),原生动物(Stout,1958b),链霉菌(Vernon,1958),藻类(弗林特,1958年)和earth(李,1958年),涉及三种草草地土壤。接下来是在耕种和未耕种的草丛草地土壤中(Thornton,1960b),酵母菌(Di Menna,1960),细菌(Stout,1960a; Ross,1960b)和原生动物(stout,1960b)的平行研究。 1960a)。 Robinson(1962)和Robinson and MacDonald(1964)进行了有关细菌菌群的后续工作。最近,人们已经注意到在草丛土壤中建立豆类和形成结节的细菌所涉及的问题(例如,Blair,1967; Adams and Lowther,1970)。缺少对高地土壤中几类生物的了解(Hayward,1967),包括线虫。线虫是土壤动物的重要组成部分……“比其他任何具有相同大小的动物都要多。显然,在土壤生物学的任何综合研究中都必须考虑到它们”(Christie,1959年)。本项目是在埃拉·海拉比小姐土著草原研究基金会的支持下启动的,目的是研究线丛草地土壤中的线虫生物学。从农业学家的角度来看,生态学研究对于了解线虫是土壤生物学的因素,以及解释植物病害病因中的植物-线虫相互作用至关重要。尽管此类研究具有重要意义,并且对土壤生物学的兴趣日益浓厚,但当前的知识仍存在许多空白。可以预见的是,具有重要经济意义的植物寄生线虫受到最广泛的关注(例如Dropkin,1955; Christie,1959; Jones,1959,1965; Seinhorst,1961; Thorne,1961; Oostenbrink,1966; Jenkins和Taylor,1967; Paramonov ,1968年);有关更一般的评论,请参见Nielsen(1949,1967),Winslow(1960)和Wallace(1963)。尽管有大量关于线虫生态学各个方面的文献,但很少有人尝试解释整个线虫种群的模式和过程。通常,生态讨论仅限于考虑种群的物理化学因素,而没有适当考虑所涉物种的生态及其与土壤动植物组成部分的相互作用。鉴于新西兰草丛土壤中线虫的信息不足,并且总体上对线虫生态学的许多方面缺乏了解,因此进行了研究,其目标如下:i)考虑线虫和线虫之间的相互关系。实验室条件下的土壤动植物,并研究代表土壤中一系列生态位的物种的生物学特性; ii)通过考虑环境中生物和非生物因素的变化以及所涉物种的生物学方面的种群分布和年度变化,调查野外线虫; iii)研究植物寄生线虫对造成草丛草地植物的损害的重要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wood Franklin H.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1971
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号