首页> 外文OA文献 >Therma performance of buildings with post-tensioned timber structure compared with concrete and steel alternatives
【2h】

Therma performance of buildings with post-tensioned timber structure compared with concrete and steel alternatives

机译:与混凝土和钢制替代品相比,后张木结构建筑的热性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis describes the influence of thermal mass on the space conditioning energy consumption and indoor comfort conditions of multi-storey buildings with concrete, steel and timber structural systems. The buildings studied were medium sized educational and commercial buildings. When calculating a building’s life-cycle energy consumption, the construction materials have a direct effect on not only the building’s embodied energy but also on the space conditioning energy. The latter depends, amongst other things, on the thermal characteristics of the building’s materials; thermal mass can also be an influence on comfort conditions in the building.A modelling comparison has been undertaken between three very similar medium-sized buildings, each designed using structural systems made primarily of timber, concrete and steel. The post-tensioned timber version of the building is a modelled representation of a real three-storey educational building that has been constructed recently in Nelson, New Zealand. The concrete- and steel-structured versions have been designed on paper to conform to the required structural codes and meet, as closely as possible, the same performance, internal space layout and external façade features as the real timber-structured building. Each of these three structurally-different buildings has been modelled with two different thermal envelopes (code-compliant and New Zealand best-practice) using a heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) system with heating only (educational scheme) and heating and cooling (commercial scheme). The commercial system (with cooling) was applied only to the buildings with the best-practice thermal envelope.The analysis of each of these nine different construction and usage categories includes the modelling of operational energy use with an emphasis on HVAC energy consumption, and the assessment of indoor comfort conditions using predicted mean vote (PMV). From an operational energy use perspective, the modelling comparison between the different cases has shown that, within each category (code-compliant, low-energy and low-energy-commercial), the principal structural material has only a small effect on overall performance. The most significant differences are in the building with the best-practice thermal envelope with the commercial HVAC system, were the concrete building has slightly lower HVAC energy consumption, being 3 and 4% lower than in the steel and timber buildings respectively The assessment of indoor comfort conditions during occupied periods through using PMV for each of the three categories shows that the timber structure consistently exhibited longer periods in the over-warm comfort zone, but this was much less pronounced in south-facing spaces. To examine the reasons for the less acceptable PMV in the timber-structure versions, an analysis of indoor timber and concrete surface temperatures was carried out in both buildings. It was found that, particularly in north-facing spaces, there were large diurnal swings in the temperatures of timber surfaces exposed to solar radiation. These swings were much less in the case of concrete surfaces so the environment was perceived to be more comfortable under such conditions because of the reduced influence of higher mean radiant temperatures.To moderate this potential downside of solar-exposed internal timber surfaces, better results are achieved if, when timber is used for thermal mass, the timber is not exposed to direct solar radiation, for example locating it in the ceilings or on the south side of the building.Two other approaches to combating the potential overheating problem in the timber-structured buildings were analysed in an illustrative mode; addition of external louvres to reduce direct solar gains at critical times of day and year; and use of phase change material (PCM) linings to act as light-mass energy buffers. Although external louvres increase comfort conditions significantly by reducing the periods of an overly warm environment, they produce an increase in heating energy consumption through reducing beneficial solar gains. The use of PCM linings shows little benefit to overall indoor comfort conditions for the building of this case-study.
机译:本文描述了热质量对具有混凝土,钢和木材结构体系的多层建筑的空间调节能耗和室内舒适条件的影响。研究的建筑物是中型教育和商业建筑物。在计算建筑物的生命周期能耗时,建筑材料不仅直接影响建筑物的内在能量,还直接影响空间调节能量。后者尤其取决于建筑物材料的热特性;热质量也可能影响建筑物的舒适度。在三座非常相似的中型建筑物之间进行了建模比较,每座建筑物均使用主要由木材,混凝土和钢制成的结构系统进行设计。后张紧的木结构建筑是真实的三层教育建筑的模型表示,该建筑最近在新西兰尼尔森建造。混凝土和钢结构版本在纸上进行设计,以符合所需的结构规范,并尽可能地满足与真正的木结构建筑物相同的性能,内部空间布局和外立面特征。这三座结构不同的建筑物中的每一个都使用仅供暖(教育方案)以及供暖和制冷的供暖,通风和空调(HVAC)系统,通过两个不同的热包络(符合规范和新西兰最佳实践)进行建模(商业计划)。商业系统(带制冷)仅适用于具有最佳实践热封层的建筑物。对这9种不同的建筑和使用类别中的每一种进行的分析包括对运行能耗的建模,重点是HVAC能耗,以及使用预测平均投票(PMV)评估室内舒适条件。从运行能耗的角度来看,不同情况之间的建模比较表明,在每种类别(符合代码,低能耗和低能耗商业)中,主要结构材料对整体性能的影响很小。最显着的差异是在商业HVAC系统中具有最佳实践热封层的建筑,混凝土建筑的HVAC能耗略低,分别比钢结构和木结构建筑低3%和4%。通过对三个类别中的每一个使用PMV,在占用期间的舒适条件表明,木材结构在超温舒适区始终表现出较长的时间,但是在朝南的空间中这并不明显。为了检查木材结构版本中PMV不能接受的原因,对两座建筑物的室内木材和混凝土表面温度进行了分析。发现,特别是在朝北的空间中,暴露于太阳辐射的木材表面的温度有很大的昼夜波动。对于混凝土表面而言,这些摆动要小得多,因此,在这种情况下,由于较高的平均辐射温度的影响减小了,因此人们认为环境更加舒适。为缓和暴露在阳光下的内部木材表面的这种潜在缺点,可以得到更好的结果。如果将木材用作热质材料时,木材没有暴露在直接的太阳辐射下(例如将其放置在天花板或建筑物的南侧),则可以达到此目的。另外两种解决木材中潜在的过热问题的方法是-以说明性方式对结构化建筑物进行了分析;增加外部百叶窗以减少一天和一年中关键时刻的直接太阳辐射;以及使用相变材料(PCM)衬里作为轻质能量缓冲器。尽管外部百叶窗通过减少过度温暖的环境来显着提高舒适度,但它们通过减少有益的太阳能获取而增加了热能消耗。 PCM衬板的使用对构建此案例研究的整体室内舒适度几乎没有好处。

著录项

  • 作者

    Perez Fernandez Nicolas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号