Our personality and the way we cope with stress are two factors that are important in the development of psychological distress. The current study explored the relationship between personality, coping styles and psychological distress in 201 students from the University of Canterbury. Participants completed the Temperament Character Inventory - Revised (TCI-R; Cloninger et al., 1994), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS; S.H. Lovibond & P.F. Lovibond, 1995) and the Coping Orientation of Problem Experience (COPE; Carver, Scheier, Weintraub, 1989). The study showed that participants with high harm avoidance and low self-directedness reported increased stress, anxiety and depression, while low harm avoidance and high self-directedness appeared to be a protective factor against the development of distress. Avoidant coping was shown to be the most maladaptive coping style as it was associated with increased stress, anxiety and depression, while problem-focused coping appeared to reduce depressive symptoms. Strong associations were also found between personality and coping styles, as individuals with high reward dependence were more inclined to engage in emotion-focused coping, while high self-directed individuals engaged in more problem-focused coping. High harm avoidance was associated with avoidant coping, resulting in greater distress than either predictor alone. The current study suggests that our personality and the coping styles we employ may influence whether we experience stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms. Furthermore, the association between personality and coping styles suggests that individuals with maladaptive personalities (e.g. high harm avoidance) are at a greater risk for experiencing psychological distress as they are more likely to use a maladaptive coping style such as avoidant coping.
展开▼
机译:我们的个性和应对压力的方式是在心理困扰发展中重要的两个因素。目前的研究探讨了来自坎特伯雷大学的201名学生的个性,应对方式和心理困扰之间的关系。参与者完成了气质特征量表的修订(TCI-R; Cloninger等,1994),抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS; SH Lovibond&PF Lovibond,1995)和问题经验的应对方向(COPE; Carver,Scheier ,Weintraub,1989)。该研究表明,具有高避免伤害和低自我指向性的参与者报告说压力,焦虑和抑郁感增加,而低避免伤害和高自我指向性似乎是防止痛苦发展的保护因素。避免应对是最适应不良的应对方式,因为它与压力增加,焦虑和抑郁相关,而以问题为中心的应对似乎可以减轻抑郁症状。在人格与应对方式之间也发现了强烈的关联,因为具有较高奖励依赖的人更倾向于以情绪为导向的应对方式,而具有较高自我指导性的人则更以问题为导向的应对方式。避免高伤害与避免应付有关,比任何一个预测因素导致更大的困扰。当前的研究表明,我们的性格和所采用的应对方式可能会影响我们是否承受压力,焦虑和抑郁症状。此外,人格与应对方式之间的关联性表明,具有不良适应性人格(例如,高伤害回避)的人遭受心理困扰的风险更大,因为他们更可能使用诸如适应性应对之类的不良适应性应对方式。
展开▼