首页> 外文OA文献 >Organisational learning and capability development in mature medium-sized firms:an exploration from an enactment perspective
【2h】

Organisational learning and capability development in mature medium-sized firms:an exploration from an enactment perspective

机译:成熟的中型企业的组织学习和能力发展:从制定角度的探索

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis uses an enactment perspective to critique and develop the concept of organisational capability. It approaches organisational capability from an interpretivist angle and inquires how organisations actually develop and renew their capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. As a consequence of adopting the enactment perspective, the thesis reveals that organisational capabilities are much more context based and variable than the positivist and predictive representation of the concept in the extant literature. It also proposes that organizational design and learning processes play a key role in the development of organisational capabilities. The research uses qualitative interviews within a case study research design. It studies six medium-sized, mature organisations operating successfully in a variety of industries with diverse market dynamism. In order to move away from a linear representation of organisational capability, the study particularly focuses on the organisational antecedents of capability development in these organisations by relying on participants’ accounts to describe how the firm coped with external environmental changes throughout its history. Based on inductive theorising from intra- and cross-industry analysis, the study observes certain discrepancies in the way existing theories conceptualise organisational capabilities as well as confirms some of their suppositions. Regarding the antecedents of organisational capabilities, the empirical evidence concludes that the development and evolution of organisational capabilities are not only determined by the level of industry dynamism (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000; Zollo and Winter, 2002); on the contrary, internal endogenous factors seem to matter as much as exogenous shocks. In terms of endogenous antecedents the study reveals a broad contrast between two distinct organisational learning mindsets – learning to innovate and innovating to learn – that influence how external industry factors are interpreted and translated into internal actions. The thesis confirms existing theories which claim that it is possible to decompose organisational capabilities into distinct, sequenced, hierarchically-ordered levels. But contrary to the literature which claims that only firms with higher-order ‘dynamic’ capabilities can succeed in changing environments, the thesis shows that multiple levels of capabilities can yield successful competitive performance for many years. Lastly, the thesis applies the concept of organisational learning mechanisms (Popper and Lipshitz, 2000) to investigate the process of capability development and argues that the structural and social facets, such as agent participation patterns and valuation of knowledge, are of particular importance in producing higher-levels of capabilities and more extensive organisational learning. The thesis contributes to the literature by showing that organisational capabilities are context-bound and idiosyncratic. They are a by-product of organisational life which comes not only through external factors and internal resources, but more importantly through managerial enactment, organisational mindset and learning mechanisms. It critiques existing theories based on the idea of organisation-environment alignment and proposes to introduce the idea of ‘envelopment’ which redefines the relationship between the organisation and its environment. The key idea is that within the same external environment, it is possible to have varying levels of firm dynamism and still to be able to maintain competitive advantage, without necessarily aiming for organisation-environment fit. This thesis contributes to the debates about the development and evolution of organisational capabilities by providing empirical support for the proposition of Zollo and Winter (2002) that there is a relationship between learning mechanisms and capabilities. As a result, it provides alternative insights into the genesis of organisational capabilities and the consequences of learning processes.
机译:本文从制定的角度来批判和发展组织能力的概念。它从解释主义者的角度探讨组织能力,并询问组织如何实际开发和更新其能力以实现可持续的竞争优势。由于采用了制定法的观点,因此本文发现组织能力比现存文献中的概念的实证主义和预测性代表更多地基于情境和变量。它还建议组织设计和学习过程在组织能力的发展中起关键作用。该研究在案例研究设计中使用定性访谈。它研究了六个中型,成熟的组织,它们在具有不同市场活力的各种行业中成功运作。为了摆脱组织能力的线性表示,该研究特别关注这些组织中能力发展的组织先决条件,它依靠参与者的陈述来描述公司在整个历史过程中如何应对外部环境变化。基于行业内和跨行业分析的归纳理论,该研究观察了现有理论在概念化组织能力方面的某些差异,并证实了它们的某些假设。关于组织能力的前因,经验证据得出结论,组织能力的发展和演变不仅取决于产业活力的水平(Eisenhardt和Martin,2000; Zollo和Winter,2002);还包括组织能力。相反,内部内生因素似乎与外来冲击同样重要。就内源性先例而言,该研究揭示了两种不同的组织学习思维方式(学习创新和创新学习)之间的广泛差异,这影响了如何解释外部行业因素并将其转化为内部行为。该论据证实了现有的理论,这些理论声称可以将组织能力分解为不同的,有序的,分层的层次。但是,与有文献声称只有具有更高阶“动态”能力的公司才能在不断变化的环境中取得成功相反,该论文表明,多层次的能力才能在多年内取得成功的竞争业绩。最后,本文运用组织学习机制的概念(Popper和Lipshitz,2000)来研究能力发展的过程,并认为结构和社会方面,例如代理人参与模式和知识评估,在生产中特别重要。更高水平的能力和更广泛的组织学习。通过证明组织能力是与上下文相关的并且是特质的,论文为文献做出了贡献。它们是组织生活的副产品,不仅来自外部因素和内部资源,而且更重要的是来自管理制定,组织思维方式和学习机制。它基于组织与环境的一致性对现有理论进行了批判,并提出引入“包围”的概念,以重新定义组织与环境之间的关系。关键思想是,在相同的外部环境中,有可能具有不同水平的企业活力,并且仍然能够保持竞争优势,而不必追求组织与环境的契合。通过为佐洛和温特(Zollo and Winter,2002)关于学习机制与能力之间存在联系的命题提供实证支持,本论文为有关组织能力发展和进化的辩论做出了贡献。结果,它为组织能力的起源和学习过程的后果提供了其他见解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kars Unluoglu Selen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号