首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Lifecycle Energy and Air Emission Differences Between Electric and Internal Combustion Vehicles
【24h】

Lifecycle Energy and Air Emission Differences Between Electric and Internal Combustion Vehicles

机译:电动车和内燃车之间的生命周期能量和空气排放差异

获取原文

摘要

The U.S. Federal Government has encouraged shifting from internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) to electric vehicles (EVs) with three objectives, reducing foreign oil dependence, greenhouse gas emissions, and criteria pollutant emissions. This thesis uses Monte Carlo simulation to predict lifecycle emissions and energy consumption differences per kilometer driven from replacing ICEVs with three EV options: lead acid, nickel cadmium (Ni-Cd), and nickel metal hydride (NiMH). All three EV options reduce U.S. foreign oil dependence by shifting to domestic coal. The probabilities that lifecycle energy consumption per km driven improve are lead acid 76%, Ni-Cd 64%, and NiMH 90%. The probabilities that EV substitution reduce global warming gas emissions are lead acid 41%, Ni-Cd 34%, and NiMH 64%. All three EV options increase sulfur oxides emissions. The probability that EV substitution will decrease nitrogen oxides emissions is only 12-14%. The probability that EV substitution reduces particulate matter emissions is less than one percent. The probability that EV substitution reduces volatile organic carbon emissions is lead acid 66%, Ni-Cd 98%, and NiMH 100%. Probabilities indicate that EVs will reduce foreign oil dependence, volatile organic carbon and lead emissions. However the other air emissions will increase and greenhouse gas emissions remain relatively unchanged.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号