首页> 美国政府科技报告 >An Effectiveness Evaluation Between Manual and Automated Readability Counting Techniques.
【24h】

An Effectiveness Evaluation Between Manual and Automated Readability Counting Techniques.

机译:手动和自动可读性计数技术的有效性评估。

获取原文

摘要

A statistical comparison was made between two automated devices which were used to count words, sentences and syllables (data points which are needed in the Flesch Reading Ease Score to determine the reading grade level of written material). The devices are the Automated Flesch Count (AFC) developed by Kincaid and McDaniel and the Navy Automated Counter (NAC) developed by the Navy to conduct a readability study of rate training and correspondence manuals. Comparisons were made between the speed and reliability of the automated devices, and between the speed and reliability of each device and the manual method of counting data points. Similar reliabilities were found for both of the devices and for the manual method.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号