【24h】

Misunderstandings Understood

机译:误会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Simon Beck offers a series of insightful challenges to an earlier paper in which I argue for a self-understanding, or narrative, view of personal identity (Schechtman 2005). His objections have shown me that my earlier paper conflates two issues that, although connected, are not connected in the straightforward way I implied. One is the.claim that narrative views, unlike psychological theories, capture what is compelling in Locke's account of personal identity. What draws us to Locke's approach is the intuition that personal continuation is at bottom a phe-nomenological fact. I suggest that psychological continuity theorists' development of the notion of 'sameness of consciousness' in terms of the contents of consciousness loses this phenomenological connection. The other claim is that the narrative approach can avoid an objection that would seem to apply to any view that does capture the intuitive appeal of Locke's account, that it has difficulty making sense of the attribution of non-conscious psychological states.
机译:西蒙·贝克(Simon Beck)在较早的论文中提出了一系列有见地的挑战,在这篇论文中,我主张对个人身份进行自我理解或叙述(Schechtman 2005)。他的异议向我表明,我的较早论文将两个问题归纳为一个问题,尽管这些问题是相互联系的,但并非以我所暗示的直接方式联系在一起。一种说法是,叙事观点与心理学理论不同,它抓住了洛克关于个人身份的观点所具有的吸引力。吸引我们进入洛克的方法的直觉是,个人延续到底是一种现象学的事实。我认为,心理连续性理论家关于意识内容的“意识相同”概念的发展就失去了这种现象学联系。另一个主张是,叙事方法可以避免一种异议,该异议似乎可以应用于确实抓住了洛克的叙述的直观吸引力的任何观点,即它难以理解无意识心理状态的归属。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号