首页> 外文期刊>Physics essays >Comment on 'Reinterpretation of the Fitzgerald-Lorentz contraction' by M. Harada and M. Sachs
【24h】

Comment on 'Reinterpretation of the Fitzgerald-Lorentz contraction' by M. Harada and M. Sachs

机译:原田先生和萨克斯先生对“费兹杰拉德-洛伦兹收缩的重新解释”评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In their recent article [Phys. Essays 11,521 (1998)], M. Harada and M. Sachs indicated that "the Lorentz transformations induce only the scale change of spatial or temporal measure and have nothing to do with physical changes." The present article points out, first, that their indication is not original, but lies at the heart of the point made by A. Einstein in 1905; second, that the procedure of concrete application of this indication adopted by them is quite different from that adopted by Einstein, and seems to be erroneous. The origin of their error lies in their wrong use of the unit of length, and in the extra introduction of the contraction factor other than the scale change, contrary to their own indication. [References: 2]
机译:在他们最近的文章[Phys。 Essays 11,521(1998)],M。Harada和M. Sachs指出:“洛伦兹变换仅引起空间或时间尺度的尺度变化,而与物理变化无关。”本文首先指出,它们的指示不是原始的,而是爱因斯坦1905年提出的观点的核心。其次,他们所采用的这一指征的具体适用程序与爱因斯坦所采用的相差很大,而且似乎是错误的。他们错误的根源在于他们错误地使用了长度单位,以及除了标度变化外还引入了收缩因子,这与他们自己的指示相反。 [参考:2]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号