...
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences >The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences
【24h】

The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences

机译:系统商:对患有阿斯伯格综合症或功能自闭症且正常性别差异的成年人的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Systemizing is the drive to analyse systems or construct systems. A recent model of psychological sex differences suggests that this is a major dimension in which the sexes differ, with males being more drawn to systemize than females. Currently, there are no self-report measures to assess this important dimension. A second major dimension of sex differences is empathizing (the drive to identify mental states and respond to these with an appropriate emotion). Previous studies find females score higher on empathy measures. We report a new self-report questionnaire, the Systemizing Quotient (SQ), for use with adults of normal intelligence. It contains 40 systemizing items and 20 control items. On each systemizing item, a person can score 2, 1 or 0, so the SQ has a maximum score of 80 and a minimum of zero. In Study 1, we measured the SQ of n = 278 adults (114 males, 164 females) from a general population, to test for predicted sex differences (male superiority) in systemizing. All subjects were also given the Empathy Quotient (EQ) to test if previous reports of female superiority would be replicated. In Study 2 we employed the SQ and the EQ with n = 47 adults (33 males, 14 females) with Asperger syndrome (AS) or high-functioning autism (HFA), who are predicted to be either normal or superior at systemizing, but impaired at empathizing. Their scores were compared with n = 47 matched adults from the general population in Study 1. In Study 1, as predicted, normal adult males scored significantly higher than females on the SQ and significantly lower on the EQ. In Study 2, again as predicted, adults with AS/HFA scored. significantly higher on the SQ than matched controls, and significantly lower on the EQ than matched controls. The SQ reveals both a sex difference in systemizing in the general population and an unusually strong drive to systemize in AS/HFA. These results are discussed in relation to two linked theories: the 'empathizing-systemizing' (E-S) theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain (EMB) theory of autism. [References: 44]
机译:系统化是分析系统或构建系统的动力。最近的一种心理性别差异模型表明,这是性别差异的一个主要方面,男性比女性更倾向于系统化。当前,没有自我报告措施来评估此重要方面。性别差异的第二个主要方面是移情(识别精神状态并以适当的情绪做出反应的动力)。先前的研究发现,女性在同理心测验上得分更高。我们报告了一种新的自我报告调查表,即系统智商(SQ),用于智力正常的成年人。它包含40个系统化项目和20个控制项目。在每个系统化项目上,一个人的得分为2、1或0,因此SQ的最高得分为80,最低得分为零。在研究1中,我们测量了总人口中n = 278名成人(114名男性,164名女性)的SQ,以测试系统化时的预期性别差异(男性优势)。还向所有受试者提供了移情商(EQ),以测试是否可以复制以前的女性优势报告。在研究2中,我们采用了SQ和EQ,其中n = 47名患有阿斯伯格综合症(AS)或功能亢进的自闭症(HFA)的成年人(33名男性,14名女性),在系统化方面预计是正常的或优越的,但是善解人意。在研究1中,将他们的分数与来自普通人群的n = 47个匹配的成年人进行了比较。在研究1中,正如预测的那样,正常成年人在SQ上的得分明显高于女性,而在EQ上的得分则明显更低。在研究2中,再次如预期的那样,患有AS / HFA的成年人得分较高。在SQ上显着高于匹配的对照组,在EQ上显着低于匹配的对照组。 SQ揭示了一般人群在系统化方面的性别差异以及AS / HFA系统化的异常强烈驱动力。这些结果与两个相关的理论进行了讨论:性别差异的“移情系统化”(E-S)理论和自闭症的极端男性大脑(EMB)理论。 [参考:44]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号