首页> 外文期刊>Petroleum Review >CCS debate intensifies on new study
【24h】

CCS debate intensifies on new study

机译:CCS辩论加剧了新研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The debate surrounding carbon capture and storage (CCS) has intensified as scientists from the Earth Sciences Division at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) in the US examine the capacity for storing carbon dioxide (CO2) underground, in a study published in the new journal Greenhouse Gases: Science & Technology. The study debates some of the conclusions drawn in an earlier study by Ehlig-Economides and Economides, countering their claims that CO2 cannot feasibly be stored underground. These earlier findings, according to the Berkeley Lab researchers, only considered closed-system subsurface formations, with limited mechanisms for relieving the pressure. Pressure build-up in the subsurface induced by the injection of CO2 from industrial-scale projects is a key constraint for the amount of CO2 that can be safely stored underground.
机译:在美国劳伦斯伯克利国家实验室(Berkeley Lab)的地球科学部的科学家研究了地下碳存储(CO2)的能力的过程中,围绕碳捕获和存储(CCS)的辩论愈演愈烈。新杂志《温室气体:科学与技术》。该研究对Ehlig-Economides和Economides的早期研究得出的一些结论进行了辩论,以反驳他们声称CO2不可能可靠地储存在地下的说法。根据伯克利实验室研究人员的说法,这些较早的发现仅考虑了封闭系统的地下地层,而释放压力的机制有限。工业规模项目注入的CO2引起的地下压力累积是可安全地下存储的CO2数量的关键限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号