首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on Psychological Science >What Should I Be Doing, and Where Are They Doing It? Scholarly Productivity of Academic Psychologists
【24h】

What Should I Be Doing, and Where Are They Doing It? Scholarly Productivity of Academic Psychologists

机译:我应该怎么做,他们在哪里做?学术心理学家的学术生产力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Scholarly productivity is used to index faculty achievement, but normative data on publication rates among academic psychologists are scarce. This article presents the results of a study of 1,216 faculty members from 96 schools, ranging from elite research universities to minor undergraduate colleges. As expected, faculty members at research universities publish the most, followed by those at elite 4-year schools and other doctoral institutions. Institutional prestige has little effect on productivity, except that elite universities employ a greater proportion of truly eminent scholars than other schools do. The fact that many of these scholars are hired by elite schools after achieving eminence elsewhere suggests that financial prowess, rather than institutional climate, produces the latter effect. Academics at all of these types of schools tend to continue publishing throughout their careers; achieving tenure has little effect on their subsequent scholarship.
机译:学术生产力被用来衡量教师的成就,但是学术心理学家中关于出版率的规范数据却很少。本文介绍了从96所学校(从精英研究型大学到小型本科学院)的1,216名教职员工的研究结果。正如预期的那样,研究型大学的教职员工人数最多,其次是精英四年制学校和其他博士学位机构的教职员工。机构声誉对生产率几乎没有影响,除了精英大学聘用的真正杰出学者比其他学校要多。这些学者中的许多人是在其他地方获得卓越地位后被精英学校聘用的,这表明财务能力而非体制氛围会产生后一种效应。所有这些类型的学校中的学者都倾向于在其整个职业生涯中继续发表论文。获得终身职位对其随后的学业影响不大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号