首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Delivery room continuous positive airway pressure/positive end-expiratory pressure in extremely low birth weight infants: a feasibility trial.
【24h】

Delivery room continuous positive airway pressure/positive end-expiratory pressure in extremely low birth weight infants: a feasibility trial.

机译:极低出生体重婴儿的分娩室持续气道正压/呼气末正压:一项可行性试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Although earlier studies have suggested that early continuous airway positive pressure (CPAP) may be beneficial in reducing ventilator dependence and subsequent chronic lung disease in the extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infant, the time of initiation of CPAP has varied, and there are no prospective studies of infants who have received CPAP or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from initial resuscitation in the delivery room (DR). Current practice for the ELBW infant includes early intubation and the administration of prophylactic surfactant, often in the DR. The feasibility of initiating CPAP in the DR and continuing this therapy without intubation for surfactant has never been determined prospectively in a population of ELBW infants. This study was designed to determine the feasibility of randomizing ELBW infants of <28 weeks' gestation to CPAP/PEEP or no CPAP/PEEP during resuscitation immediately after delivery, avoiding routine DR intubation for surfactant administration, initiating CPAP on neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and assessing compliance with subsequent intubation criteria. METHODS: Infants who were of <28 weeks' gestation, who were born in 5 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network NICUs from July 2002 to January 2003, and for whom a decision had been made to provide full treatment after birth were randomized to receive either CPAP/PEEP or not using a neonatal T-piece resuscitator (NeoPuff). Infants would not be intubated for the sole purpose of surfactant administration in the DR. After admission to the NICU, all nonintubated infants were placed on CPAP and were to be intubated for surfactant administration only after meeting specific criteria: a fraction of inspired oxygen of >0.3 with an oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter of <90% and/or an arterial oxygen pressure of <45 mm Hg, an arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide of >55 mm Hg, or apnea requiring bag and mask ventilation. RESULTS: A total of 104 infants were enrolled over a 6-month period: 55 CPAP and 49 control infants. No infant was intubated in the DR for the exclusive purpose of surfactant administration. Forty-seven infants were intubated for resuscitation in the DR: 27 of 55 CPAP infants and 20 of 49 control infants. Only 4 of the 43 infants who had a birth weight of <700 g and 3 of the 37 infants of <25 weeks' gestation were resuscitated successfully without positive pressure ventilation, and no difference was observed between the treatment groups. All infants of 23 weeks' gestation required intubation in the DR, irrespective of treatment group, whereas only 3 (14%) of 21 infants of 27 weeks' required such intubation. For infants who were not intubated in the DR, 36 infants (16 CPAP infants and 20 control infants) were subsequently intubated in the NICU by day 7, in accordance with the protocol. Overall, 80% of studied infants required intubation within the first 7 days of life. The care provided for 52 (95%) of 55 CPAP infants and 43 (88%) ofthe 49 control infants was in compliance with the study protocol, with an overall compliance of 91%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that infants could be randomized successfully to a DR intervention of CPAP/PEEP compared with no CPAP/PEEP, with intubation provided only for resuscitation indications, and subsequent intubation for prespecified criteria. Forty-five percent (47 of 104) of infants <28 weeks' gestation required intubation for resuscitation in the DR. CPAP/PEEP in the DR did not affect the need for intubation at birth or during the subsequent week. Overall, 20% of infants did not need intubation by 7 days of life. This experience should be helpful in facilitating the design of subsequent prospective studies of ventilatory support in ELBW infants.
机译:目的:尽管较早的研究表明,早期持续气道正压(CPAP)可能有助于降低极低出生体重(ELBW)婴儿的呼吸机依赖性和随后的慢性肺部疾病,但是CPAP的起始时间有所不同,并且尚无前瞻性研究,研究结果表明,从分娩室初次复苏(DR)中获得CPAP或呼气末正压(PEEP)的婴儿。 ELBW婴儿的当前实践包括早期插管和通常在DR中使用预防性表面活性剂。尚未在ELBW婴儿人群中前瞻性确定在DR中启动CPAP并继续进行该治疗而无需插管表面活性剂的可行性。这项研究旨在确定在分娩后立即进行复苏时将<28周妊娠的ELBW婴儿随机分配至CPAP / PEEP或无CPAP / PEEP的可行性,避免常规表面活性剂给药的常规DR插管,在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)上启动CPAP )入院,并评估是否符合随后的插管标准。方法:2002年7月至2003年1月在5个国家儿童健康与人类发展新生儿研究网络新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)出生的妊娠小于28周的婴儿,并已决定要在出生后提供全面治疗被随机分配接受CPAP / PEEP或不使用新生儿T形复苏器(NeoPuff)。不能仅出于DR中表面活性剂给药的目的而插管婴儿。进入新生儿重症监护病房后,所有未插管的婴儿均应置于CPAP上,仅在满足以下特定标准后才能插管表面活性剂:吸入氧分数> 0.3,脉搏血氧仪的血氧饱和度<90%和/或<45 mm Hg的动脉氧压,> 55 mm Hg的二氧化碳的动脉分压或需要呼吸袋和面罩的呼吸暂停。结果:六个月内共有104例婴儿入选:55名CPAP和49名对照婴儿。没有单独为表面活性剂施用而在DR中插管任何婴儿。在DR中对47名婴儿进行了插管复苏术:55名CPAP婴儿中的27名和49名对照婴儿中的20名。在没有正压通气的情况下,出生体重<700 g的43例婴儿中只有4例在妊娠小于25周的37例婴儿中有3例成功复苏,各治疗组之间无差异。无论治疗组如何,所有妊娠23周的婴儿都需要在DR中插管,而21周的21周婴儿中只有3例(14%)需要插管。对于未插管在DR中的婴儿,根据协议,随后在第7天,将36例婴儿(16名CPAP婴儿和20例对照婴儿)插管在NICU中。总体而言,80%的研究婴儿在出生后的前7天需要插管。为55名CPAP婴儿中的52名(95%)和49名对照婴儿中的43名(88%)提供的护理符合研究方案,总体依从性为91%。结论:这项研究表明,与没有CPAP / PEEP相比,婴儿可以成功地随机分配到CPAP / PEEP的DR干预中,插管仅用于复苏指征,随后进行插管以达到既定标准。妊娠<28周的婴儿中有百分之四十五(104名中的47名)需要进行插管以在DR中进行复苏。 DR中的CPAP / PEEP不会影响出生时或随后一周的插管需求。总体而言,20%的婴儿在7天的生命中不需要插管。这项经验应有助于简化ELBW婴儿通气支持的后续前瞻性研究设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号