...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Continuous versus multiple rapid infusions of indomethacin: effects on cerebral blood flow velocity.
【24h】

Continuous versus multiple rapid infusions of indomethacin: effects on cerebral blood flow velocity.

机译:连续或多次快速注射吲哚美辛:对脑血流速度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE. Therapeutic administration of indomethacin for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure has been documented to decrease cerebral blood flow velocity which may be harmful to the vulnerable premature neonate. We have therefore compared the effects of administering indomethacin by rapid injection versus slow, continuous indomethacin infusion at the same total therapeutic dose on middle cerebral artery (MCA) systolic and diastolic flow velocity, resistance index, and cerebral blood flow (as reflected by the integrated area under the curve). METHODS. Premature neonates (< 1750 g) documented echocardiographically to have a PDA were randomized to receive indomethacin either by three rapid injection doses or by continuous intravenous infusion over the ensuing 36 hours, providing an equivalent total dose. Echocardiograms and transcranial color flow mapping of the MCA flow velocity were measured at baseline and serially following initiation of therapy in both groups. Effects on cerebral blood flow velocity are presented. RESULTS. Eighteen infants [rapid injection-1.2 +/- 0.3 kg (n = 9) and continuous-1.1 +/- 0.2 kg (n = 9)] were studied. In the rapid injection treated infants decreased flow velocity in the MCA as manifested by abrupt, significant decreases in systolic (to 70 +/- 8% baseline) and diastolic (to 65 +/- 13% baseline) flow velocity and area under the curve (to 60 +/- 10% of baseline) were evident by 4 minutes and progressed to 30 minutes after treatment initiation. These changes were not observed in the group treated with continuous indomethacin. Both therapeutic modalities were equally successful in closing the ductus, although the numbers are too small to definitively determine therapeutic efficacy. CONCLUSIONS. Slow, continuous infusion eliminated the decrease in cerebral flow velocity and appears to be effective in closing the PDA.
机译:目的。吲哚美辛用于动脉导管未闭(PDA)封闭的治疗性给药已被证明可降低脑血流速度,这可能对脆弱的早产儿有害。因此,我们比较了在相同的总治疗剂量下,快速注射吲哚美辛与缓慢,连续吲哚美辛输注对大脑中动脉(MCA)收缩和舒张流速,阻力指数和脑血流的影响(如综合曲线下的面积)。方法。超声心动图记录为具有PDA的早产婴儿(<1750 g)被随机分配接受吲哚美辛,方法是连续3次快速注射剂量或随后连续36小时静脉内输注,以提供相等的总剂量。两组均在基线和开始治疗后连续测量超声心动图和经颅彩色MCA流速图。提出了对脑血流速度的影响。结果。研究了18例婴儿[快速注射1.2 +/- 0.3千克(n = 9)和连续注射1.1 +/- 0.2千克(n = 9)]。在快速注射治疗的婴儿中,MCA的流速降低,表现为突然,收缩期(基线降低至70 +/- 8%)和舒张期(基线降低至65 +/- 13%)和曲线下面积(到基线的60 +/- 10%)在4分钟后变得明显,并开始至治疗开始后30分钟。在用连续消炎痛治疗的组中未观察到这些变化。两种治疗方式在闭合导管方面均同样成功,尽管数量太少而无法确定治疗效果。结论。缓慢,连续的输液消除了脑血流速度的降低,并且似乎对闭合PDA有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号