首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: an evaluation of three devices.
【24h】

Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: an evaluation of three devices.

机译:早产儿可变流量与连续流量鼻持续气道持续正压期间的肺募集和呼吸方式:三种装置的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether lung volume changes and breathing pattern parameters differ among 3 devices for delivery of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in premature infants. METHODS: Thirty-two premature infants receiving nasal CPAP for apnea or mild respiratory distress were enrolled. Birth weight was (mean +/- standard deviation) 1081 +/- 316 g, gestational age 29 +/- 2 weeks, age at study 13 +/- 12 days, and fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO(2)) at study.29 +/-.1. Three devices, applied in random order, were studied in each infant: continuous flow nasal CPAP via CPAP prongs, continuous flow nasal CPAP via modified nasal cannula, and variable flow nasal CPAP. After lung recruitment to standardize volume history, changes in lung volume (DeltaV(L)) were assessed at nasal CPAP of 8, 6, 4, and 0 cm H(2)O using calibrated direct current-coupled respiratory inductance plethysmography. RESULTS: DeltaV(L) was significantly greater overall with the variable flow device compared with both the nasal cannula and CPAP prongs. However, DeltaV(L) was not different between the cannula and the prongs. Respiratory rate, tidal volume, thoraco-abdominal asynchrony, and FIO(2) were greater with the modified cannula than for either of the other 2 devices. CONCLUSION: Compared with 2 continuous flow devices, the variable flow nasal CPAP device leads to greater lung recruitment. Although a nasal cannula is able to recruit lung volume, it does so at the cost of increased respiratory effort and FIO(2).
机译:目的:确定早产儿经鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的3种设备之间的肺容量变化和呼吸模式参数是否不同。方法:纳入了32例因呼吸暂停或轻度呼吸窘迫接受鼻CPAP治疗的早产儿。出生体重为(平均+/-标准偏差)1081 +/- 316 g,胎龄29 +/- 2周,研究时的年龄13 +/- 12天,研究中的吸入氧气(FIO(2))的比例.29 +/-。1。在每个婴儿中研究了三种随机应用的装置:通过CPAP插脚进行连续流鼻CPAP,通过改良的鼻插管进行连续流鼻CPAP,以及通过可变流鼻CPAP。征募肺以标准化体积史后,使用校准的直流耦合呼吸电感体积描记法在鼻CPAP分别为8、6、4和0 cm H(2)O的情况下评估肺体积的变化(DeltaV(L))。结果:与鼻插管和CPAP插脚相比,可变流量装置的DeltaV(L)总体上显着更大。但是,插管和插脚之间的DeltaV(L)相同。改良的插管的呼吸频率,潮气量,胸腹异步和FIO(2)比其他两种设备中的任何一种都更大。结论:与2种连续流量设备相比,可变流量鼻CPAP设备可导致更多的肺募集。尽管鼻导管能够吸收肺部容积,但这样做的代价是增加了呼吸强度和FIO(2)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号