首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Montelukast, compared with fluticasone, for control of asthma among 6- to 14-year-old patients with mild asthma: the MOSAIC study.
【24h】

Montelukast, compared with fluticasone, for control of asthma among 6- to 14-year-old patients with mild asthma: the MOSAIC study.

机译:MOSAIC研究显示,孟鲁司特与氟替卡松相比可控制6至14岁轻度哮喘患者的哮喘。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend daily controller therapy for mild persistent asthma. Montelukast has demonstrated consistent benefit in controlling symptoms of asthma and may be an alternative, orally administered, nonsteroidal agent for treating mild asthma. METHODS: The Montelukast Study of Asthma in Children (MOSAIC study) was a 12-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial to determine the effect of once-daily, orally administered montelukast (5 mg) (n = 495), compared with twice-daily, inhaled fluticasone (100 microg) (n = 499), on the percentage of asthma rescue-free days (RFDs) (any day without asthma rescue medication and with no asthma-related resource use). Patients 6 to 14 years of age had mild persistent asthma (average percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second: 87.2%; RFDs at baseline: 64%). Montelukast would be considered not inferior to fluticasone if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean percentages of RFDs (fluticasone minus montelukast) was above -7% (a difference of approximately 2 days/month). RESULTS: The mean percentage of RFDs was 84.0% in the montelukast group and 86.7% in the fluticasone group. The least-squares mean difference was -2.8% (95% confidence interval: -4.7% to -0.9%), within the noninferiority limit of -7%. The proportion of patients requiring systemic corticosteroids and the number of patients with an asthma attack were greater in the montelukast group. Both montelukast and fluticasone were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast was demonstrated to be not inferior to fluticasone in increasing the percentage of RFDs among 6- to 14-year-old patients with mild asthma. Secondary end points, including percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second value, days with beta-receptor agonist use, and quality of life, improved in both groups but were significantly better in the fluticasone treatment group.
机译:背景:指南建议对轻度持续性哮喘每日进行控制治疗。孟鲁司特已证明在控制哮喘症状方面具有一致的益处,并且可能是口服的非甾体类药物,用于治疗轻度哮喘。方法:孟鲁司特儿童哮喘研究(MOSAIC研究)是一项为期12个月的多中心,随机,双盲,非劣效性试验,旨在确定每日一次口服孟鲁司特(5毫克)的疗效(n = 495)。与每天两次吸入氟替卡松(100微克)(n = 499)相比,无哮喘抢救天数(RFD)的百分比(每天没有哮喘抢救药物且不使用与哮喘有关的资源)。 6至14岁的患者患有轻度持续性哮喘(1秒内预计的强制呼气量平均百分比:87.2%;基线时的RFD:64%)。如果RFD的平均百分比差异(氟替卡松减去孟鲁司特)的95%置信区间的上限高于-7%(相差约2天/月),则认为孟鲁司特不次于氟替卡松。结果:孟鲁司特组RFD的平均百分比为84.0%,氟替卡松组为86.7%。最小二乘均值差异为-2.8%(95%置信区间:-4.7%至-0.9%),且非劣势限度为-7%。孟鲁司特组中需要全身性皮质类固醇的患者比例和患有哮喘发作的患者人数较多。孟鲁司特和氟替卡松均耐受良好。结论:在增加6至14岁轻度哮喘患者的RFD百分比方面,孟鲁司特不逊于氟替卡松。二级终点,包括预测的以1秒为单位的强制呼气量百分比,使用β受体激动剂的天数和生活质量,在两组中均得到改善,但在氟替卡松治疗组中明显更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号