首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Pulmonology >Dynamics of spontaneous breathing during patient-triggered partial liquid ventilation.
【24h】

Dynamics of spontaneous breathing during patient-triggered partial liquid ventilation.

机译:患者触发部分液体通气期间的自发呼吸动力学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study evaluates different ventilator strategies during gas (GV) and partial liquid ventilation (PLV) in spontaneously breathing animals. We hypothesized that during PLV, spontaneously breathing animals would self-regulate respiratory parameters by increasing respiratory rate (RR) and minute ventilation (V'E) when compared to animals mechanically ventilated with gas, and further that full synchronization of each animal's effort to the ventilator cycle would decrease RR at stable tidal volumes (V(T)). We studied 12 newborn piglets (1.54 +/- 0.24 kg) undergoing GV and PLV in 3 different modes: intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV), synchronized IMV (SIMV), and assist control ventilation (AC). Modes occurred sequentially in random order during GV first, with the same order then repeated during PLV. Animals initially received continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and returned to CPAP during PLV at the end of the experiment. Pressure-limited, volume-targeted ventilation was used with a tidal volume goal of 13 cc/kg. Rate was set at 10/min during IMV and SIMV, with a back-up rate of 10/min during AC. RR, V'E, mechanical (V(T)) and spontaneous tidal volumes (sV(T)) were measured breath-to-breath using a computer-assisted lung mechanics analyzer; mean values were determined over 30-min periods. Data analysis used paired t-tests with Bonferroni correction as needed (P < 0.05). Blood gases were stable in all modes during GV and PLV. RR (min(-1)) and V'E (L x min(-1)/kg) increased in all modes from GV to PLV (RR: CPAP 71 vs. 128; IMV 69 vs. 112; SIMV 65 vs. 107; AC 33 vs. 47. V'E: CPAP 0.47 vs. 0.72; IMV 0.46 vs. 0.61; SIMV 0.45 vs. 0.61; AC 0.38 vs. 0.53; P < 0.05). Intermode comparisons during PLV showed a lower RR with AC (P < 0.02), and a higher V'E with CPAP (P < 0.05). V(T) and dynamic respiratory system compliance decreased from GV to PLV (V(T) P < 0.05; C(rs,dyn) P < 0.01); sV(T) remained unchanged. V(T) and sV(T) did not differ in intermode comparisons. We conclude that during PLV, spontaneously breathing piglets with normal lungs maintain physiologic blood gases by increasing V'E through increased RR. AC produced the most efficient respiratory pattern during PLV, with increased V'E achieved by a modest increase in RR.
机译:这项研究评估了自发呼吸动物在气体(GV)和部分液体通风(PLV)期间的不同呼吸机策略。我们假设在PLV期间,与机械通气的动物相比,自发呼吸的动物会通过增加呼吸频率(RR)和分钟通气(V'E)来自我调节呼吸参数,进而使每只动物的努力与呼吸完全同步。在稳定的潮气量(V(T))下,呼吸机循环会降低RR。我们研究了以三种不同模式进行GV和PLV的12头新生仔猪(1.54 +/- 0.24 kg):间歇性强制通气(IMV),同步IMV(SIMV)和辅助控制通气(AC)。模式首先在GV期间以随机顺序顺序出现,然后在PLV期间以相同顺序重复出现。实验开始时,动物最初接受持续的气道正压通气(CPAP),并在PLV期间恢复为CPAP。使用压力限制,以体积为目标的通气,潮气量目标为13 cc / kg。在IMV和SIMV期间,速率设置为10 / min,在AC期间,备份速率为10 / min。使用计算机辅助的肺力学分析仪,从呼吸到呼吸来测量RR,V'E,机械性(V(T))和自发潮气量(sV(T))。在30分钟内确定平均值。数据分析根据需要使用配对t检验和Bonferroni校正(P <0.05)。在GV和PLV期间,血气在所有模式下均稳定。从GV到PLV的所有模式下RR(min(-1))和V'E(L x min(-1)/ kg)均增加(RR:CPAP 71 vs.128; IMV 69 vs.112; SIMV 65 vs. 107; AC 33对47.V'E:CPAP 0.47对0.72; IMV 0.46对0.61; SIMV 0.45对0.61; AC 0.38对0.53; P <0.05)。 PLV期间的模式间比较显示,AC的RR较低(P <0.02),CPAP的V'E较高(P <0.05)。 V(T)和动态呼吸系统顺应性从GV降低到PLV(V(T)P <0.05; C(rs,dyn)P <0.01); sV(T)保持不变。 V(T)和sV(T)在模式间比较中没有差异。我们得出结论,在PLV期间,具有正常肺部的自发呼吸的仔猪通过增加RR来增加V'E来维持生理性血气。 AC在PLV期间产生了最有效的呼吸模式,而RR的适度增加使V'E增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号