首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Pulmonology >Efficacy of nebulized epinephrine versus salbutamol in hospitalized infants with bronchiolitis.
【24h】

Efficacy of nebulized epinephrine versus salbutamol in hospitalized infants with bronchiolitis.

机译:雾化肾上腺素与沙丁胺醇在住院婴儿毛细支气管炎中的疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We enrolled 30 infants (median age 3 months, range 1-12 months), hospitalized for bronchiolitis in a randomized double-blind trial, to examine the efficacy and safety of nebulized epinephrine compared to salbutamol. Once admitted, patients were treated with either nebulized 0.5 mg of an 0.1% epinephrine solution (0.5 mL in 3.5 mL normal saline (NS)) or 2.5 mg nebulized salbutamol (0.5 mL in 3.5 mL NS). They were evaluated daily before and after nebulization until discharge. The outcome measures used were: baseline clinical score (based on respiratory rate, subcostal retraction, presence of wheezing, and O2 requirement), change in clinical O2 score after nebulization, duration of O2 therapy, and duration of hospitalization. A significant improvement in the clinical score was noted on the first day of hospitalization in subjects receiving epinephrine (P = 0.025); that change was not seen in those on salbutamol (P = 0.6). Nebulized epinephrine decreased the baseline clinical score faster than salbutamol (P = 0.02), though on the fourth study day there was no significant difference between the two scores. On the fourth and fifth days of study there were more patients hospitalized in the salbutamol group than in the epinephrine group (P = 0.03 vs. P = 0.025). No adverse effects were associated with nebulized therapy. We conclude that nebulized epinephrine is a more effective agent than salbutamol in the initial treatment of bronchiolitis and is equally safe. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:我们在一项随机双盲试验中招募了30名婴儿(中位年龄3个月,范围1-12个月)住院治疗细支气管炎,以检查雾化肾上腺素与沙丁胺醇相比的疗效和安全性。入院后,将患者用雾化的0.5 mg 0.1%肾上腺素溶液(0.5 mL在3.5 mL生理盐水(NS)中)或2.5 mg雾化的沙丁胺醇(0.5 mL在3.5 mL NS中)治疗。在雾化之前和之后每天对其进行评估,直到出院。所使用的结局指标是:基线临床评分(基于呼吸频率,肋下退缩,喘息的存在和O2需求),雾化后临床O2评分的变化,O2治疗的持续时间和住院时间。接受肾上腺素治疗的患者住院第一天的临床评分有显着改善(P = 0.025);在使用沙丁胺醇的患者中未观察到这种变化(P = 0.6)。雾化的肾上腺素比沙丁胺醇降低基线临床评分的速度更快(P = 0.02),尽管在第四个研究日,两个评分之间没有显着差异。在研究的第四天和第五天,沙丁胺醇组住院患者比肾上腺素组住院患者多(P = 0.03 vs. P = 0.025)。雾化治疗无不良反应。我们得出结论,在细支气管炎的初始治疗中,雾化的肾上腺素比沙丁胺醇更有效,并且同样安全。版权所有2001 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号