首页> 外文期刊>Parking Review >Cities steer clear of the charging zone
【24h】

Cities steer clear of the charging zone

机译:城市避开充电区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the high profile success of London's congestion charge in cutting traffic, only one other British city is likely to introduce a similar scheme before the end of the decade. Edinburgh is pressing ahead with plans for a £2 charge to be operational by spring 2006. But elsewhere, local authorities previously in favour of congestion charging have become wary. One reason may be the perceived impact of road user charging on town and city centre economies; retailers in central London, such as John Lewis, have complained that the charge has lost them customers. Authorities would also have noted that the London scheme failed to cover its costs during its first year of operation. Transport for London (TfL) spent £130m on the scheme - including its operation, laying on more buses and penalty compliance - but generated only £68m in revenue, half of what had been predicted. There are also the political implications of introducing road user charging - cabinet members fear that an unpopular scheme could lose them their seats. A TfL spokesman told Parking Review: "Other cities are watching if Ken Livingstone is re-elected [in June's mayoral elections]. They are also waiting to see what the longer term effects of the scheme will be."
机译:尽管伦敦的交通拥堵收费措施在减少交通方面大获成功,但在本世纪末之前,只有另一个英国城市可能会采用类似的计划。爱丁堡正在推动计划在2006年春季之前开通2英镑的收费计划。但是在其他地方,以前赞成拥堵收费的地方政府却变得谨慎。原因之一可能是道路使用者收费对城镇和市中心经济的影响。伦敦市中心的零售商,例如约翰·刘易斯(John Lewis),抱怨说这项收费使他们失去了客户。当局还将注意到,伦敦计划在其运营的第一年中未能支付其费用。伦敦交通局(TfL)在该计划上投入了1.3亿英镑,包括其运营,铺设更多公交车和遵守罚则,但仅产生了6,800万英镑的收入,仅为预期的一半。实行道路使用者收费还具有政治意义-内阁成员担心,不受欢迎的计划可能会使他们失去席位。 TfL的一位发言人告诉《停车评论》:“其他城市正在关注肯·利文斯通是否再次当选(在6月的市长选举中)。他们还在等待,看看该计划的长远影响是什么。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号