首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >Efficacy of interlaminar vs transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic unilateral radicular pain: prospective, randomized study.
【24h】

Efficacy of interlaminar vs transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic unilateral radicular pain: prospective, randomized study.

机译:层间与经椎间孔硬膜外注射类固醇治疗慢性单侧神经根痛的疗效:前瞻性随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE, DESIGN AND SETTINGS: The purpose of this randomized, prospective study is to compare the efficacy of two different routes in administering epidural steroid injections interlaminar (IL) vs transforaminal (TF) in patients with unilateral radicular pain. PATIENTS: We randomly enrolled and followed 64 patients with chronic radiculopathy. RESULTS: Significant improvements were maintained throughout 6 months (24 weeks) of follow-up (P<0.001, respectively). The average visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 24 weeks improved to 4.0 +/- 2.2 cm in the IL group and 3.8 +/- 2.1 cm in the TF group (P=0.717). Baseline functional capacity was comparable for the IL and the TF group (52% vs 53%) when assessed using Oswestry (P=0.647). At 6 months, both groups improved, 39% for the IL group and 38% for the TF group, suggesting change from severe to moderate disability scoring range. There were 24 out of the 32 (75%) patients in the IL group at 24 weeks who improved more than 2 cm on the VAS scale and 17 patients (53%) had >50% of the pain relief. In the TF group, there were 27 out of the 32 (84%) patients with >2 cm improvement on VAS pain scale, and 20 of 32 (63%) with >50% improvement at 24 weeks. Functional capacity changes were similar, 16 out of the 32 patients (50%) improved 10 points or more on the Oswestry scale in the IL group and 21 out of the 32 in the TF group (66%). CONCLUSIONS: Using either route of epidural injections to deliver steroids for unilateral chronic radiculopathy secondary to herniated intervertebral disc provided significant improvements in patients function and pain relief. However, we could not find a statistically significant difference between two indicated groups either in functional improvement or in reduction in pain, although half-dose of steroids delivered via TF route provided somewhat better long-term pain relief and functional capacity improvements.
机译:目的,设计和背景:这项随机,前瞻性研究的目的是比较两种方法在单侧放射状疼痛患者中施用硬膜外类固醇注射层间(IL)与经椎间孔(TF)的疗效。患者:我们随机入组并追踪了64例慢性神经根病患者。结果:在整个随访的6个月(24周)中均保持了显着改善(分别为P <0.001)。 IL组的平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分在IL组为4.0 +/- 2.2 cm,在TF组为3.8 +/- 2.1 cm(P = 0.717)。使用Oswestry进行评估时,IL和TF组的基线功能能力相当(52%比53%)(P = 0.647)。在6个月时,两组均得到改善,IL组为39%,TF组为38%,表明从严重到中度残疾评分范围有所变化。 IL组在24周时有32位(75%)患者中有24位的VAS评分改善了2 cm以上,而17位患者(53%)的疼痛缓解率超过了50%。在TF组中,32例患者中有27例(84%)的VAS疼痛评分改善了> 2 cm; 32例中有20例(63%)的24周时改善了> 50%。功能能力变化相似,IL组的Oswestry评分在32例患者中有16例(50%)改善了10分以上,而TF组的32例患者中有21例改善了21点(66%)。结论:采用硬膜外注射的任何一种途径输送类固醇激素可治疗继发于椎间盘突出的单侧慢性神经根病,可显着改善患者的功能并减轻疼痛。但是,尽管通过TF途径递送的半剂量类固醇可提供更好的长期缓解疼痛和改善功能能力的功能,但我们并未发现两个所示组在功能改善或疼痛减轻方面有统计学上的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号