首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >The Effect of a Translating Research into Practice (TRIP)-Cancer Intervention on Cancer Pain Management in Older Adults in Hospice
【24h】

The Effect of a Translating Research into Practice (TRIP)-Cancer Intervention on Cancer Pain Management in Older Adults in Hospice

机译:临终研究(TRIP)-癌症干预研究对临终关怀老年人癌症疼痛管理的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Pain is a major concern for individuals with cancer, particularly older adults who make up the largest segment of individuals with cancer and who have some of the most unique pain challenges. One of the priorities of hospice is to provide a pain-free death, and while outcomes are better in hospice, patients still die with poorly controlled pain. Objective. This article reports on the results of a Translating Research into Practice intervention designed to promote the adoption of evidence-based pain practices for older adults with cancer in community-based hospices. Setting. This Institutional Human Subjects Review Board-approved study was a cluster randomized controlled trial implemented in 16 Midwestern hospices. Methods. Retrospective medical records from newly admitted patients were used to determine the intervention effect. Additionally, survey and focus group data gathered from hospice staff at the completion of the intervention phase were analyzed. Results. Improvement on the Cancer Pain Practice Index, an overall composite outcome measure of evidence-based practices for the experimental sites, was not significantly greater than control sites. Decrease in patient pain severity from baseline to post-intervention in the experimental group was greater; however, the result was not statistically significant (P=0.1032). Conclusions. Findings indicate a number of factors that may impact implementation of multicomponent interventions, including unique characteristics and culture of the setting, the level of involvement with the change processes, competing priorities and confounding factors, and complexity of the innovation (practice change). Our results suggest that future study is needed on specific factors to target when implementing a community-based hospice intervention, including determining and measuring intervention fidelity prospectively.
机译:背景。疼痛是癌症患者的主要关注点,尤其是老年人,他们是癌症患者的最大组成部分,并且有一些最独特的疼痛挑战。临终关怀的优先事项之一是提供无痛性死亡,尽管临终关怀的结局更好,但患者仍然会死于控制不良的疼痛。目的。本文报告了“将研究转化为实践”干预措施的结果,该干预措施旨在促进以社区为基础的收容所中患有癌症的老年人采用循证疼痛疗法。设置。此机构人类受试者审查委员会批准的研究是在16个中西部收容所中实施的整群随机对照试验。方法。使用新入院患者的回顾性医疗记录来确定干预效果。此外,分析了干预阶段完成时从临终关怀人员那里收集的调查和焦点小组数据。结果。癌痛实践指数的改善(一项针对实验点的循证实践的总体综合结果衡量指标)并不明显大于对照点。实验组从基线到干预后的患者疼痛严重程度降低幅度更大;但是,结果在统计学上不显着(P = 0.1032)。结论。研究结果表明可能会影响多成分干预措施实施的许多因素,包括环境的独特特征和文化,变更流程的参与程度,竞争性优先事项和混淆因素以及创新(实践变更)的复杂性。我们的结果表明,在实施基于社区的临终关怀干预措施时,需要针对特定​​因素进行未来研究,包括前瞻性确定和衡量干预措施的保真度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号